Chris S 49
New Member
Dear All,
Me: age=65 yrs.: Ht. =172 cm. : inside leg=79 cm. nominal frame size for road bikes indicated = 54 cm.
I aim to get into longish distance cycling + some moderate speed cycling as a work-out. Have opted to go for a 'more comfortable' road bike.
The man in the shop has suggested a 58cm. frame, saying that I look OK on it. I'm inclined to go for 56 cm. - somehow 58 cm. seems big. The frame size range for this bike is 48, 51, 54, 56, 58, 61 cm. Given that I am ( I would reckon) less than average height, 58 cm. again seems too big. (assuming punters for this bike will have similar cycling aspirations)
Which size should I plump for? (given that the true answer will only emerge after a few weeks of cycling). Would I notice the difference anyway?
Cheers,
Chris
Me: age=65 yrs.: Ht. =172 cm. : inside leg=79 cm. nominal frame size for road bikes indicated = 54 cm.
I aim to get into longish distance cycling + some moderate speed cycling as a work-out. Have opted to go for a 'more comfortable' road bike.
The man in the shop has suggested a 58cm. frame, saying that I look OK on it. I'm inclined to go for 56 cm. - somehow 58 cm. seems big. The frame size range for this bike is 48, 51, 54, 56, 58, 61 cm. Given that I am ( I would reckon) less than average height, 58 cm. again seems too big. (assuming punters for this bike will have similar cycling aspirations)
Which size should I plump for? (given that the true answer will only emerge after a few weeks of cycling). Would I notice the difference anyway?
Cheers,
Chris