luckyfox
She's the cats pajamas
- Location
- County Durham
So sad, such a waste, stupid fluke!
how many batsman would play the shots without a helmet, knowing if they miss it they are in serious trouble? It is wide of me offside I'm not adverse to trying to carve it over point, but if it's on the button I'm not taking the risk. If you don't have the safety blanket, you keep your eyes on the ball and get out of the way of it. In the days before helmets there were not many compulsive hookers now it seems unusual for a batsman not to hook.That's the modern game too though - in limited overs, you can't afford to be stood at the crease giving the other side dot balls, certainly not at the top level.
Fair point - I don't think I'd add anything to my post you quoted, and I feel slightly uneasy about extending the discussion further in this particular thread.how many batsman would play the shots without a helmet, knowing if they miss it they are in serious trouble? It is wide of me offside I'm not adverse to trying to carve it over point, but if it's on the button I'm not taking the risk.
Bad, very bad & a sad time for all most closely connected to Phil & the incident.
Maybe helmet design needs revisiting, advancements are being made all the time in cycling protection for head & rest of body, why not for cricket or hockey etc ?
Maybe RM ?On the helmet design thing, I read an article which suggested he'd have been protected by this years design of the helmet: