If Bike Brands where Cars Brands?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

aces_up1504

Well-Known Member
Thought this on the way to work, noticing people of bikes and then all the different brands of cars:

If Bike Brands where Cars Brands what bike brand would be Ford and so on...
 

deptfordmarmoset

Full time tea drinker
Location
Armonmy Way
Mine are both Rovers!
 

deptfordmarmoset

Full time tea drinker
Location
Armonmy Way
But slightly more serious: it still amazes me how many different makes of bikes there are. Something like Raleigh would have been the Ford equivalent, I suppose, but Raleigh's days as a dominant force in a mass market are over.
 

oldroadman

Veteran
Location
Ubique
FUN? Cycling isn't meant to be FUN, it is obvious you are not a REAL cyclist.:evil:


:biggrin:
It is when you finally retire from racing...^_^ and start to just be at the races helping the sport along. All the upside, no suffering (well, maybe a bit when I hit the hills nowadays).
 
Quoted Off topic post deleted by Mod

There is a great deal that is comparable in the way bicycles and cars are marketed today. This was not so 25 or 30 years ago.

I noticed a small change when the MTB boom happened. Some 'consumers' were getting more obsessed than they might have been with the latest Kona, Marin or GF frames. It all got a little 'branded'. The gradual introduction of fancier parts and the impact of those on the residuals (and desirability) of the old stuff also offers some comparison with the motor industry.

Now (last 8-10 years maybe) some very clear comparisons have developed.

Look at bicycle and equipment ads in the posher cycling magazines. Look at the frequent mention in the trade, in the press and by riders themselves of the model year. Where did that come from? The car industry. "I love my '65 Chevy".

Listen to leisure riders stopping on a longer run... "I'm gonna get a new this" "I'm loving this year's Cubes" "Time to replace my wheels with something lighter". Not racers, not even fast club riders, just people who enjoy spending their hard-earned on something that makes them smile and have been sucked up into a consumer vortex in the same way that they were when they thought a Golf GT would get them to granny's house faster than the GL.... And on a 61 plate.

The auto and bicycle markets have a great deal in common. Brands, brand identities and brand values are being developed, paid for and evolved in much the way VW tries to convince us that a SEAT, a VW, and Audi and a Skoda are entirely different machines.

Look at the way ranges are huge and the price increment to the 'next one up' seems tiny.. But once you've made the jump the next increment seems tiny too. Pure 1970s Ford.

My fixie would be a 1971 Austin 1300 GT or a BMW 2002tii. Better than it looks, faster than it looks and just fun to be around.

My geared road bike would be a 2006 Alfa 166. Not very pretty and nobody knows what it is, but it's Italian and it does what it does very well.

My Pace hardtail MTB would be a Lada Niva. Nobody who has driven a Niva off-road says bad things about it.

Most of the big brands today (Specialized, Trek, Pinarello, Felt etc) would be arms of VW or FIAT. Whatever the perceived quality, they are just production numbers being pumpd out to fulfill a turnover and income requirement. I have two Treks and a Pinarello, but that doesn't stop it being so.

As ever, I am right and everyone who disagrees with me is wrong.
 

akb

Veteran
My trek Hybrid would be similar to that of a Freelander...there is always something wrong with it.
My Spesh MTB would have to be a Discovery! Because I do just that.
 

berty bassett

Legendary Member
Location
I'boro
i can't see why you bothered to put a spanner in someones thread - the two must be comparable - most things are comparable , but i would have thought two things sometimes made of metal sometimes carbon and both having wheels are certainly comparable . i believe the thread would have been posted as a bit of fun - maybe leading to funny names and stuff like that . to just try and kill the thread stone dead seemed to me to be pointless when you could quite easily just move to something that did interest you

By Mod - this post left in, even though it makes reference to deleted posts.
 
i can't see why you bothered to put a spanner in someones thread - the two must be comparable - most things are comparable , but i would have thought two things sometimes made of metal sometimes carbon and both having wheels are certainly comparable . i believe the thread would have been posted as a bit of fun - maybe leading to funny names and stuff like that . to just try and kill the thread stone dead seemed to me to be pointless when you could quite easily just move to something that did interest you

This post just makes me so angry! You are wrong, wrong, wrong. Some things simply cannot be compared.

I just tried to complete a blackboard equation with a piece of Camembert. I thought it would compare nicely with chalk. And does it? No!

So please keep your helpful so-called opinions to yourself Mr Bassett.
 

jowwy

Not here offten enough to argue
This post just makes me so angry! You are wrong, wrong, wrong. Some things simply cannot be compared.

I just tried to complete a blackboard equation with a piece of Camembert. I thought it would compare nicely with chalk. And does it? No!

So please keep your helpful so-called opinions to yourself Mr Bassett.
this seems to have turned into the slate the guy above you thread :whistle:
 
U

User6179

Guest
Cheap Raleigh bikes of old are definately comparable to hugos!, once seen a brand new hugo and it looked like it had been hand painted by a blind man.
 
Top Bottom