"If Starmer were to depart as leader tomorrow, he would not leave a trace of a meaningful political project in his wake."
Strong words from one of Starmer's key allies, who was one of the brains behind his leadership bid.
Nothing too much to argue with in that article, especially as it is highlighting the need to be a bit more like Blair/Mandelson in his tactical approach, and emphasising the need to change from a political project that had hit the buffers.
I still think he was a good choice as leader to emphasise that change from the failure of leadership in the last ten years or so, but I am disappointed he has allowed Johnson off the hook too often, possibly trying not to look too opportunist in the middle of a pandemic. Perhaps not being Corbyn was the right tactic in the campaign and the very early days of his leadership, but now he has to show the electorate and the party who he is, not who he is not.
Now that things are looking a little more positive on the pandemic with the roll-out of the vaccines he has to get on the front foot a bit more with Johnson and define what direction he would take the Labour Party and the country post (hopefully) pandemic and post Brexit.
I hope and believe it is possible to win the next election as I cannot see anyone else able to step into his place over the next few years without the party shooting itself in the foot again.