I think anybody of whatever size would use more oxygen walking over a set distance than they would do cycling. And walkers, do they pay pavement tax?"You claim that it is environmentally friendly to ride a bike. But if I am not mistaken, a cyclists [sic] has an increased heart rate and respiration. That means that the act of riding a bike results in greater emissions of carbon dioxide from the rider. Since CO2 is deemed to be a greenhouse gas and a pollutant, bicyclists are actually polluting when they ride."
Quote from the lawmaker in question. Surely an overweight, unfit driver would be producing more CO2.
Don't give him ideas...... And walkers, do they pay pavement tax?
A government with an idea? Surely that's dangerous!This sort of thing may give our government ideas![]()
Cyclists aren't releasing CO2 trapped in fossil fuels - all the CO2 we expire comes from the food we've eaten. It's then used by plants to produce more food, either for us or animals. There is no net increase.