Would you class a 40% drop in cycling collisions as a good result ?

[spen666]

Spen - I missed your 666th post! Or was it not intended for mortal eyes?

sh*t!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I missed it as well

 

[dellzeqq]

with apologies to the OP

Spen - the text of your 666th post will be forever immortal

Take a trailer then?

I'm sure that these will be analysed in minute detail, and that people will find prophecy in them

 

[very-near]

there is far more to the concerns of LCC than simply the number of accidents. Having motorbikes whizzing past cyclists closer & at a higher speed than other traffic causes fear & concern for cyclists and puts off nervous cyclists from using the bus lanes.

The OP has managed to ignore we are talking about a statistically insignificant number of accidents to draw any conclusions. 3 or 5 accidents is statistically insignificant

Also the OP is ignoring the concerns of other road users and trying to base an argument on statistics alone. This ignore the fact that people have feelings & concerns

Look at it another way. The Motorcyclists and families of motorcyclists having to risk life and limb on the roads of London no doubt appreciate that access to these bus lanes will lower the risk of serious injury substantially.

Oh, Welcome Back Spen

 

[dellzeqq]

and anyway, who cares? Motorcyclists are creatures of endless invention and will get themselves killed wherever. It's what they do best. And they're not numerically significant. And they are not so hot on hygiene

 

[very-near]

I expect that their mums care, but it is not for nothing that A&E doctors call them donors.

Twat

 

[very-near]

Your insult is misplaced, it is not me who uses the term.

It has been used to describe cyclists as well. Your prejudice of motorcyclist's has already been noted. There are many people who do both on here. It make you come across as someone who has a bit of an inferiority complex when in the company of people who you struggle to identify with...