glenn forger
Guest
There is no evidence that the rider kicked the car, the evidence about the damage that cost £300 was not submitted. In a court case where two people tell different stories one must be lying.
And how's he gone and earned £600 out of it?
So she's on the road...and she's in a rage...and she's harrassing the man...and then feels the need to knock him off his bike...doesn't that fit the definition?
And how's he gone and earned £600 out of it?
And how's she still got a licence?
Didn't even have an MOT, so her insurance can't have been valid either?!?
Puzzled.
The CPS won't usually prosecute for MOT document offences if the vehicle subsequently passes and earns a ticket within 7 days. Don't ask me why, no other type of criminal gets 7 days Grace to put their offending right.
Kicked car to let driver know cyclist was there and about to be runover...just saying
Because the court/judge says so.How is that not criminal damage for him and assault using a car as a weapon for her?
Think so unless it goes to appealAre you sure about that?
How is that not criminal damage for him and assault using a car as a weapon for her?
Dear Lord almighty. This sucks.There we have it. Deliberately hitting a cyclist with your car, and admitting it, isn't dangerous.
She was fined £600, he doesn't get that.
not to disagree with any of your post but pedant hat on, fines totalled £600, not compensation.
Not having an MOT or Tax for that matter does not invalidate the insurance.
Technically, the MOT test is only valid for the day it is issued.