Most misleading gradient sign

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Dogtrousers

Kilometre nibbler
I still visualise hills better when written as 1 in 10, 1 in 7, 1 in 4 etc.
Although I grew up with it, I never got the hang of that. Here's a little chart
1625059246833.png
 
Last edited:

Dogtrousers

Kilometre nibbler
I cant understand the %age, 35% of what exactly? The ratio 1:3 means something, every 3 units along you go up or down 1 unit, it ain’t a fraction.
They're just numbers.

One expresses the forward travel units required to ascend one unit. The other expresses the ascent in terms of a percentage of forward travel.

One gives smaller numbers for steeper hills, the other larger numbers for steeper hills.

Neither takes into account the actual distance travelled, just the forward component of it.

Both fall to bits when describing a vertical climb, where there is no forward component. In this sense I guess degrees is the best way. Or maybe radians! :laugh:
 

Ming the Merciless

There is no mercy
Location
Inside my skull
I only looked on Strava because of the feeling in my legs! And I didn't take the instantaneous reported number on Strava, but the average over a significant distance.

Anyway, here's the OS. It's around a 25% average from the 150 to 275 contour.

View attachment 596549

Just for comparison, here's a later climb on same ride advertised at 17% (1:6)

View attachment 596550

The (very short) steepest part of this climb is far less severe that what the top one averages for half a kilometre!

Interesting no chevron on first extract. Single chevron means greater than 1 in 6 aka 16% or so.
 

Craig the cyclist

Über Member
There is one on the Bristol to Bath Railway path, it's a lie, it's way nearer 1:110 in my experience

1625269547453.png
 

Mr Celine

Discordian
Don't believe Strava. I'm on my phone so can't link to it but there is a segment called Roman Rd Climb to the West of Hownam in the Scottish Borders. The Strava profile includes a vertical pitch of several hundred feet. Presumably this is why they rate it as cat 2.
I've never needed a rope but a triple does help.
Here it is with its infamous vertical pitch, apparently 800 feet.
1625429574346.png


In reality the hardest part of this climb is just before the beginning of the segment, where a triple does help. The contour map shows the height difference of the entire segment as only 30m, or about 100 feet.
 

Mike_P

Guru
Location
Harrogate
Have you flagged it with them? Also create a duplicated segment off your own record labelled corrected elevation to show them the difference.
 

MontyVeda

a short-tempered ill-controlled small-minded troll
I cant understand the %age, 35% of what exactly? The ratio 1:3 means something, every 3 units along you go up or down 1 unit, it ain’t a fraction.
as i understand it (which may be wrong) 100% would be 1:1 or 45 degrees.

but what i don't understand is...
... Here's a little chart
View attachment 596613
Why does 1:5 or 20% feel so steep, when 11 degrees looks like a gentle slope on a protractor?

protractor.svg
 
Top Bottom