That wouldn't tick the inclusivity box.
I'll throw in here. As a newcomer part of what made the FNRttC's seem like something I could do was that they came with a solid level of expectation. From reading previous reports there were things that I could just presume, the route planning, not being dropped, the pace, the Organisation, food would be eaten. Those could be taken for granted because the whole thing was being run by a benign dictatorship and time had been spent refining everything to make it as good as it could be at that point.
2015 is a bit of a test year,
@dellzeqq is taking a well deserved break from being the shoulders that everything else rests on and people are stepping up to make sure that the experience doesn't disappear too. This is good.
While part of the joy of it all is a sense of anarchic madness, there's some smoke and mirrors there that make it so. In a year where the waters are being tested it might be worth accepting that some of that illusion might best be dropped. So a schedule makes sense (in fact, for insurance purposes is necessary). I'd also suggest that a brief set of statements identifying the ride also makes sense, so that people can tell how close to their expectations the ride is going to be. After my first FNRttC we tried a group ride out with one of our local shops. They'd met us a number of times, we've bought a few bikes from them, we've made no secret of how we ride and our fitness levels. They were welcoming, comforting, absolutely definite that they never dropped a rider, positive we'd love their slow group. We lasted around half a kilometre. They got to the first incline, obviously didn't consider it a hill, raced up it while one of our number slowed down somewhat (they plod hills and make up time on the flat) and we never saw them again. Currently their website is advertising their next outing, it happily states they never drop a rider...
So, I'd suggest you need to state distance, midway stop quality, destination type (is it the coast for those geographically challenged!) pace (or maybe expected ride time to first stop and last stop), TEC's present, Waymarker present, the number of riders you're working on. Some sort of quantifiable hilliness rating. First timer friendly. That sort of thing. The rides that are replicating existing FNRttC routes should be easy to write up and based on that new routes could be written up.
This isn't about arguing over what is or isn't a ride. That way lies divisive madness. To help the people you want along, and to prove you've thought things through for this year at least, I think it would help if we showed our working a little.