6 million and counting!

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Boris Bikes have been going for a year now with six million journeys clocked up with no serious injuries. The London & national statistics would have predicted about 13 serious injuries in that number of journeys. Which asks the question Why are Boris Bikes so much safer?
 

david1701

Well-Known Member
Location
Bude, Cornwall
STEEEEL :tongue:
 

corshamjim

New Member
Location
Corsham
Let's face it - the Boris bike is hardly the kind of thing which will inspire the rider to go nuts.

I've not tried one yet, because last time I was in Lundun they hadn't yet started allowing you to hire there-and-then with your credit card. I'll certainly have a go when the opportunity arises.
 

SteelUn

Guest
Boris Bikes have been going for a year now with six million journeys clocked up with no serious injuries. The London & national statistics would have predicted about 13 serious injuries in that number of journeys. Which asks the question Why are Boris Bikes so much safer?

Because it weighs 23kg!?

The "posh-boy toy" comment in that article is just stupid...
 
[Tosses grenade]Helmets[hides] and less contraversial normal clothes.

Drivers see people on them as more human and capable of error and therfore take more care around them.

Plus they are quite visible bikes.
 

Norm

Guest
[Tosses grenade]Helmets[hides] and less contraversial normal clothes.

Drivers see people on them as more human and capable of error and therfore take more care around them.

Plus they are quite visible bikes.
I think that there's something in this but, extrapolating, is it helped because most people can visualise themselves spending a quid to get a day's use of them?

Conversely, people see a lycra-clad roadie or baggied-up MTBer and they cannot see anything beyond the image, so they don't feel any empathy towards the cyclist.

How about some of the riders themselves being a bit more circumspect if they aren't used to cycling in London?

I wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't many, if not all, of the above reasons to some extent.
 

srw

It's a bit more complicated than that...
TfL analysed their ridership and found the majority were while professional males aged 25-44 earning over £50k. So there is some substance behind the comment.

Actually, if I take the Standard's innumerate spin off and read between the lines (frustrating they don't actually publish the data), they probably found that the majority were aged between 25-44, the majority earned over £50k and the majority were male. Which isn't at all the same thing.

It's also not surprising given the sort of people who tend to live in or go into central London on a regular basis and who are likely to be inclined to try cycling.
 

Ed Crane

Senior Member
Also, they're simply the best way to get around. I've used them on 3 trips to London purely as a tourist. September, January and June. So three seasons and even the bitter cold of January was ok really. All you need is normal road sense and Smartphone App for bike stations and its a total joy.
 

zimzum42

Legendary Member
Should all public schemes be judged on the basis of whether we get impoverished people from minority ethnic groups joining in?
 
Top Bottom