City cyclists inhale double the soot

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Orange

Active Member
Location
Northamptonshire
City cyclists inhale double the soot, research says - http://www.bbc.co.uk...london-15053299

London cyclists inhale more than double the amount of black carbon, or soot, than pedestrians, research suggests.

The study by Prof Jonathan Grigg from Barts and the London School of Medicine, showed the cyclists had 2.3 times more inhaled soot than walkers.

Evidence suggests breathing in black carbon could lead to heart problems and reduced lung function.

The findings are to presented to the European Respiratory Society's annual congress in Amsterdam.


Our data strongly suggest that personal exposure to black carbon should be considered when planning cycling routes”

End Quote In the study, researchers tested five adults who regularly cycled to work in London, and five pedestrians for inhaled soot particles, which are created by motor vehicle exhausts.

All participants in the study were non-smoking, healthy commuters aged between 18 and 40.

Dr Chinedu Nwokoro, one of the researchers of the study and an active cyclist, said: "The results of this study have shown that cycling in a large European city increases exposure to black carbon.

"This could be due to a number of factors including the fact that cyclists breathe more deeply and at a quicker rate than pedestrians while in closer proximity to exhaust fumes, which could increase the number of airborne particles penetrating the lungs.

"Our data strongly suggest that personal exposure to black carbon should be considered when planning cycling routes.

"Whether cycling by healthy individuals is in itself associated with adverse health effects is currently being assessed in a larger ongoing study."
 

ianrauk

Tattooed Beat Messiah
Location
Rides Ti2
Well, seeing as studies have shown that regular cyclists live longer then non cyclists I think I will take my chances.
 

dellzeqq

pre-talced and mighty
Location
SW2
this is a press release about a document that is not, as far as I can tell, available on the European Respiratory Society website, and which I doubt any of the twenty or so news organisations that have reprinted the press release has read.

Move along..........
 
"The researchers tested five cyclists and five pedestrians"
So a statistically insignificant sample then. Is it more per hour, per mile, per journey?
 

fossyant

Ride It Like You Stole It!
Location
South Manchester
Don't you just love research that states the obvious ? Cyclists breath deaper - wow never knew that :wacko:

So what, weigh up the pros and cons.
 
So the Daily Mail was right – cycling is very dangerous for your health and you are much better off enclosing yourself in a box, filtering out some of the particles (but not the really small, really dangerous ones) while generating loads more particles for the “plebs” outside…:rolleyes:
 

ianrauk

Tattooed Beat Messiah
Location
Rides Ti2
The Daily Mail is always right isn't it?
whistling.gif
biggrin.gif
 

dellzeqq

pre-talced and mighty
Location
SW2
The paper's abstract is on page 184s of http://www.ers-educa...1/files/105.pdf
you're right. And it reads like a GCSE project.
 

MissTillyFlop

Evil communist dictator, lover of gerbils & Pope.
City cyclists inhale double the soot, research says - http://www.bbc.co.uk...london-15053299

London cyclists inhale more than double the amount of black carbon, or soot, than pedestrians, research suggests.

The study by Prof Jonathan Grigg from Barts and the London School of Medicine, showed the cyclists had 2.3 times more inhaled soot than walkers.

Evidence suggests breathing in black carbon could lead to heart problems and reduced lung function.

The findings are to presented to the European Respiratory Society's annual congress in Amsterdam.


Our data strongly suggest that personal exposure to black carbon should be considered when planning cycling routes”

End Quote In the study, researchers tested five adults who regularly cycled to work in London, and five pedestrians for inhaled soot particles, which are created by motor vehicle exhausts.

All participants in the study were non-smoking, healthy commuters aged between 18 and 40.

Dr Chinedu Nwokoro, one of the researchers of the study and an active cyclist, said: "The results of this study have shown that cycling in a large European city increases exposure to black carbon.

"This could be due to a number of factors including the fact that cyclists breathe more deeply and at a quicker rate than pedestrians while in closer proximity to exhaust fumes, which could increase the number of airborne particles penetrating the lungs.

"Our data strongly suggest that personal exposure to black carbon should be considered when planning cycling routes.

"Whether cycling by healthy individuals is in itself associated with adverse health effects is currently being assessed in a larger ongoing study."

To be honest, we're all doomed anyway in London, apparently.

I've taken to totally ignoring what the papers write about health, as otherwise, I'd end up as a very confused Howard Hughes type, scared to leave my house (although houses are probably DEADLY!)

Last year the big story was the riding the northern line for 20 mins every day was the equivalent to smoking 60 fags a week, so I'll make do with inhaling soot for now!
 
To be honest, we're all doomed anyway in London, apparently.

I've taken to totally ignoring what the papers write about health, as otherwise, I'd end up as a very confused Howard Hughes type, scared to leave my house (although houses are probably DEADLY!)

Last year the big story was the riding the northern line for 20 mins every day was the equivalent to smoking 60 fags a week, so I'll make do with inhaling soot for now!

but how will this affect house prices?
 

benb

Evidence based cyclist
Location
Epsom
So, a tiny, and therefore not statistically significant sample.
No adjustment, AFAICT, for differing journey distances. In other words, for a given distance would you inhale more soot on foot or on a bike?

Unscientific drivel.
 
Top Bottom