What I'll be using it for:
* Mostly commuting
* The occasional long ride out into the wilderness/camping
* Maybe, someday, a race
Why I like the AWOL:
* It's indestructible, or at least near there... I could be rough with it
* Steel means I might be able to sell it for more later (compared to carbon)
* It weighed at 26 pounds-- this was the large model (I need a medium) with inferior steel. One size smaller, and with the lighter steel that comes with the COMP model, it should weigh a bit less. (The Tricross was 22 pounds.)
* It was super smooth to ride
* It can handle weight-- I'll need to be carrying 20lbs of groceries once in awhile.
Cons:
* It didn't feel as "zippy" as the TriCross
* It's a tad bit more expensive
Why I liked the Tricross
* It felt zippy-- I felt faster, or accelerated faster
* It's (maybe) a better commuter bike
What I disliked about the Tricross:
* It had inferior breaks
* I could feel every little bump
* It's probably not a great choice for camping/getting groceries
What would you do?
* Mostly commuting
* The occasional long ride out into the wilderness/camping
* Maybe, someday, a race
Why I like the AWOL:
* It's indestructible, or at least near there... I could be rough with it
* Steel means I might be able to sell it for more later (compared to carbon)
* It weighed at 26 pounds-- this was the large model (I need a medium) with inferior steel. One size smaller, and with the lighter steel that comes with the COMP model, it should weigh a bit less. (The Tricross was 22 pounds.)
* It was super smooth to ride
* It can handle weight-- I'll need to be carrying 20lbs of groceries once in awhile.
Cons:
* It didn't feel as "zippy" as the TriCross
* It's a tad bit more expensive
Why I liked the Tricross
* It felt zippy-- I felt faster, or accelerated faster
* It's (maybe) a better commuter bike
What I disliked about the Tricross:
* It had inferior breaks
* I could feel every little bump
* It's probably not a great choice for camping/getting groceries
What would you do?