Twilkes
Guru
At the risk of starting another 13 page thread (which was very entertaining by the way), one of the problems I find cycling is that people (drivers and pedestrians) don't seem to take the speed of a bike into account. Most motorised vehicles on town main roads will be travelling at 25-30mph (outside of London anyway) so you don't need to judge the speed - if you can see how far away it is, you'll know roughly how long it will take to reach you.
But cyclists' speeds tend to vary, anything from 30mph to barely above walking pace. So quite often I'll be x yards away from a side street and a car will start nudging out, only to stop once it realises I'm almost on top of it. I plan for this and have never had anything dangerous happen, but it seems that, as well as SMIDSY, a lot of cycling incidents could be due to the cyclist travelling faster than the driver/pedestrian expected them to be travelling. I've had three in the last week where a vehicle had to stop because they found a cyclist where they were expecting a piece of empty road.
Are there any commuters who think they're particularly fast or slow compared to the average cyclist, and do you think this causes you more or less problems?
But cyclists' speeds tend to vary, anything from 30mph to barely above walking pace. So quite often I'll be x yards away from a side street and a car will start nudging out, only to stop once it realises I'm almost on top of it. I plan for this and have never had anything dangerous happen, but it seems that, as well as SMIDSY, a lot of cycling incidents could be due to the cyclist travelling faster than the driver/pedestrian expected them to be travelling. I've had three in the last week where a vehicle had to stop because they found a cyclist where they were expecting a piece of empty road.
Are there any commuters who think they're particularly fast or slow compared to the average cyclist, and do you think this causes you more or less problems?