
More heinous than Hein himself.
No, Hein Verbruggen, receiver of bribery fees from Lance to the UCI. He's one of the few people in cycling to have deserved his own adjective.You mean Hitler as in Hein Hitler?
It'll be OK Crankarm, I doubt if it will reach a second page unless some ******** mentions helmets.Not another LA thread.

That's one of the big questions. Had he been clean amongst a clean field, it's actually quite possible that he would have been a real champion. We'll never really know. All we know is that he took winning with EPO to a new level.Not to defend him - he gives every impression of being an peanut - but the situation is surely muddied by the fact that during the whole period he was competing, the entire sport was, by common consent, absolutely awash with drugs. Indeed he apparently refers at one point in his self-justification to doping up 'to achieve a level playing field'.
It seems pretty much certain that if he hadn't won all those Tours, they would've been won by someone else on drugs. Surely to be a 'cheat of cheats', you'd have to be grabbing yourself an unfair advantage. Since the competition was for the most part 'cheating' equally, it's not entirely clear that that's the case.

for sustained cheating by an individual, running a system that went across his teams, lying, and, indeed, perjuring............I make you right. I don't see anybody close. Barry Bonds did it for years. Florence Griffith-Joyner and Ben Johnson broke records, and cyclists of all stripes, going back a hundred years have used everything from cocaine to speed, but for sheer scale, breadth and chutzpah, not to mention profit, Armstrong is the top or very close to it,Is he the baddest sports cheat baddie of all time? Is there anyone else who compares? I can't think of anyone...can anybody?