Not tonight Josephine
- Thread starter rsvdaz
- Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
- Location
- The TerrorVortex
Does the same logic work the other way round?
If so...I'm either going to get more action or an expensive new bike!!!!
If so...I'm either going to get more action or an expensive new bike!!!!
Does the same logic work the other way round?
If so...I'm either going to get more action or an expensive new bike!!!!
You've left out doghouse, clout and probably quite a few others....
- Location
- The TerrorVortex
A good point well made. I shall keep quiet.
Melonfish
Evil Genius in training.
- Location
- Warrington, UK
Does the same logic work the other way round?
If so...I'm either going to get more action or an expensive new bike!!!!
LMAO!
i must admit when i'm naughty the wife doesn't tell me i'm sleeping in the garden, i'd just throw my tarp up, setup my bivi and sleeping bag, build a fire and enjoy a night under the stars hehe.
here you go:
Frenchman ordered to pay wife damages for lack of sex
A Frenchman has been ordered to pay his ex-wife £8,500 in damages for failing to have enough sex with her during their marriage.
The wife blamed the break-up on her husband's lack of activity in the bedroom Photo: REX
By Our Foreign Staff
12:41PM BST 05 Sep 2011
The 51-year-old man was fined under article 215 of France’s civil code, which states married couples must agree to a “shared communal life”.
A judge has now ruled that this law implies that “sexual relations must form part of a marriage”.
The rare legal decision came after the wife filed for divorce two years ago, blaming the break-up on her husband’s lack of activity in the bedroom.
A judge in Nice, southern France, then granted the divorce and ruled the husband named only as Jean-Louis B. was solely responsible for the split.
But the 47-year-old ex-wife then took him back to court demanding 10,000 euros in compensation for “lack of sex over 21 years of marriage”.
The ex-husband claimed “tiredness and health problems” had prevented him from being more attentive between the sheets.
But a judge in the south of France’s highest court in Aix-en-Provence ruled: “A sexual relationship between husband and wife is the expression of affection they have for each other, and in this case it was absent.
“By getting married, couples agree to sharing their life and this clearly implies they will have sex with each other.”
Night Train
Maker of Things
- Location
- Greater Manchester
Given that ruling it implies that the Judge was making a determination of what should be included in sharing a life together in marriage.
That could cause problems in itself.
How many other things or activitites are married couples supposed to share and would that mean all couples have to do and share the same things equally?
I might have to sit through episodes of Dr Who and she would have to sit through heavy haulage videos and help get mucky building a car!
That could cause problems in itself.
How many other things or activitites are married couples supposed to share and would that mean all couples have to do and share the same things equally?
I might have to sit through episodes of Dr Who and she would have to sit through heavy haulage videos and help get mucky building a car!
Sittingduck
Legendary Member
- Location
- Somewhere flat
- Location
- The TerrorVortex
Given that ruling it implies that the Judge was making a determination of what should be included in sharing a life together in marriage.
That could cause problems in itself.
How many other things or activitites are married couples supposed to share and would that mean all couples have to do and share the same things equally?
I might have to sit through episodes of Dr Who and she would have to sit through heavy haulage videos and help get mucky building a car!
Are you seriously asking us lot for relationship advice???
You're in deep trouble if you're relying on us!!!
(anyway, she might be good at building a car, for all I know)
