Drago
Legendary Member
- Location
- Suburban Poshshire
It's a gay recognition thing.
It seems nobbers are overly caring about their lighting safety as I haven't had the chance to ask anyone if they want their rizlas back to measure the next overtake *and* if they knew they only had one brake light. I think I'd probably actually start with the light thing, and when their guard was down point out that it'd be handy if they left more than 6" between themselves and a bike next time they overtook (I may still be cross about last night's commute home here...)Odd that. What about cases where you do both?
I had a problem a while back with my reversing light coming on at odd times, stopped at the lights in 1st gear was the most common time.I sometimes tell drivers about nonfunctional lights if convenient when stopped at lights. They tend not to care as well.
True, though in my case it is nearly 10 years old and the first time a bulb has gone.It stuns me the number of cars that are only a couple of years old and have rear or brake lights out. I could also imagine that very few people check them with any regularity so they can end up driving like this for ages (actually, those two together could be the answer to the conundrum...).
What like blue lights on cars that shouldn't have them ?It's a gay recognition thing.
It's a gay recognition thing.
Bizarrely, not instantly illegal at all. The laws are all to do with the lights on the bike you can put whatever you fancy on the rider. Stupid, but then why should that surprise anyone.Red front/white rear are fairly common amongst the illegal set ups, but I've seen a flashing blue mounted on a helmet (which was actually very eye-catching but very, very illegal).