View: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKQPGP5IiSc
well I think he was RLJing as he doesnt show himself going through the light.
lots of clueless comments on that video. I have to take the policeman's side on this one if the cyclists ran the red.
See highway code rule 71 for cyclists
Don't RLJ!
True, but it really is a pity that the officer didn't know the law on this:
Road Traffic Act 1988:
168 Failure to give, or giving false, name and address in case of reckless or careless or inconsiderate driving or cycling.E+W+S
Any of the following persons—
(a)the driver of a [F1mechanically propelled vehicle] who is alleged to have committed an offence under section 2 or 3 of this Act, or
(b)the rider of a cycle who is alleged to have committed an offence under section 28 or 29 of this Act,
who refuses, on being so required by any person having reasonable ground for so requiring, to give his name or address, or gives a false name or address, is guilty of an offence.
Sections 28 and 29 are concerned with dangerous, careless or inconsiderate cycling (which probably includes jumping red lights).
Never mind the policeman. The cyclist is a berk isn't he?
'Danny' is a schmuck. A complete and total embarrassment.
'Danny' is a schmuck. A complete and total embarrassment.