Think of the survey this way. It might be that the man or woman knows nothing at all (wtf is nail fatigue?), but the simple fact that the survey mentions this will bash the value in a big way.
Here's the deal. The timbers in this roof may be undersized. Note the word may. If you put on a new roof covering (which may be heavier than the existing) you may have to replace the timbers. If you are putting on a new roof it will have to be designed by a structural engineer - do not, for pity's sake, think that what is there now is necessarily correct. If there is evidence of the roof spreading (purlins separating from struts, rafters shifting against wall plates) you really must get it looked at by a structural engineer. If it's not so far from South London I may be able to put you in touch with somebody.
The basic problem is this - the surveyor thinks there is a problem but hasn't really thought through how to make sure the problem goes away. That's why, with roofs, foundations, wall deflection and the like you are best off calling in the experts.
This all sounds a bit dramatic. The key is to find a structural engineer who is not simply going to cover his or her backside.
Oh - the spray may well corrode galvanised or copper fixings. That's not clever.