Origamist said:I've found this especially for Linf and other interested forumites:
"Sports Utility Vehicles: Collision Risks and Outcomes for London’s Road Users"
http://londonroadsafety.tfl.gov.uk/www/downloads/publications/SUV_report.pdf
August 2009
Ithankyouverymuch

Given the document is 75 pages, I'll have to chew through it, but in the interim, here is a quote from it.
Proof that the hot air spouted about being at a greater risk from a SUV is just that - hot air
Overall, the number of collisions in London involving SUVs was relatively small, with 2.7% of cars involved in collisions being SUVs. Relative to the number of registered SUVs, small and large SUVs were around 30% less likely to be involved in a collision than a non-SUV passenger car. Pedestrians in London were 21% less likely to be involved in a collision with a large SUV than with a non-SUV, relative to the number of registered vehicles. The pedestrian casualty rates for small SUVs and non-SUVs did not differ significantly. Pedal cyclists and motorcyclists also had a significantly lower risk of being injured in a collision with a large or small SUV compared with the average passenger car (on average around 20% lower).