The Football.....

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Mike_P

Legendary Member
Location
Harrogate
We are currently playing Senegal.
Or is this the next stage
Actually Congo DR
Steve Clarke has resigned, a couple of weeks after signing a 4 year contract.
Strange to renew a contract before the tournament?

Strange. Now presumably needs to find his own flight home?

Nine African nations in the 32 but none play each other.
 
Last edited:

Beebo

Firm and Fruity
Location
Hexleybeef
So it looks like any path to World Cup glory will be tricky.
R16 Mexico at altitude
QF Brazil
SF Argentina
F France/Spain.

Clearly this is all speculative. But it’s a tricky route. I predict an QF exit to Brazil.
 

Mike_P

Legendary Member
Location
Harrogate
Taking a positive Scotland did go as far as South Korea and Uruguay. Its been an unique tournament with the sheer number of Africa teams winning out of the first stage with 9 compared to 6 being the most before.
 

Vapin' Joe

Formerly known as Smokin Joe
Taking a positive Scotland did go as far as South Korea and Uruguay. Its been an unique tournament with the sheer number of Africa teams winning out of the first stage with 9 compared to 6 being the most before.

The international game is levelling up. Countries which we used to regard as cannon fodder now have their top players playing for European sides and also have access to good class coaches and their methods.
 

No Ta Doctor

Über Member
The international game is levelling up. Countries which we used to regard as cannon fodder now have their top players playing for European sides and also have access to good class coaches and their methods.

The majority of the DR Congo players were born and raised in Europe - France, Belgium and England mainly - and could probably have chosen to play for European teams. I'm sure it's a similar situation in some of the other African teams, especially sub-Saharan. They've benefited from expensive European training and coaching set-ups as well as playing at a high level since youth. No surprise that the expansion to 48 teams sees more of them getting through the group stages
 

Vapin' Joe

Formerly known as Smokin Joe
No surprise that the expansion to 48 teams sees more of them getting through the group stages

Forty eight teams is a nonsense. It would be better expanding it to 64 with sixteen groups and the top two of each going into the knock outs. It would not mean many more matches, be easier to follow and with the tournament increasingly shared between neighbouring countries logistics would be easily manageable.

Forty eight seems like a number dreamed up by a committee who couldn't agree on anything sensible.
 
Last edited:

No Ta Doctor

Über Member
Forty eight teams is a nonsense. It would be better expanding it to 64 with sixteen groups and the top two of each going into the knock outs. It would not mean many more matches, be easier to follow and with the tournament increasingly shared between neighbouring countries logistics would be easily manageable.

Forty eight seems like a number dreamed up by a committee who couldn't agree on anything sensible.

64? Your groups would essentially be decided by whether you could put more than 17 past The Solomon Islands or something.
 
Top Bottom