Brutal hit and run, Nottingham

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Spinney

Bimbleur extraordinaire
Location
Back up north
Ah - searching on 120623 got me this:
upload_2016-2-3_16-37-10.png


So the thing itself is not yet ready for the public to sign.
 
You don't have both sides of the story because the two occupants of the car failed to disclose who was driving and thereby avoided being charged with failing to stop and failing to report. They sound like the type of folk who are going to provide a truthful account of events to help you make up your mind though...
I guess we'll never know.
 

Sara_H

Guru
Surely it should be fairly simple to legislate to close this loophole. So if the person responsible for the car fails to disclose who was driving they get whacked with the maximum sentence/fine/points of whatever offence has been committed. So in this case Dangerous driving, failure to stop at the scene.
 

Sara_H

Guru
Is that something you'd like to see? A person who has no evidence against him of injuring anyone, possibly punished beyond what the courts have already done?
If you have responsibility for a car, then you have responsibility for knowing who is driving it. If you don't know who is driving a car that you're responsible for then you are negligent and thats your problem, not the problem of everyone else in society.
As it is I suspect its very unlikely that the people responsible don't know who was driving, but if they don't, then that's their fault. Its about time car owners were made to start taking responsibility.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
glenn forger

glenn forger

Guest
Surely it should be fairly simple to legislate to close this loophole. So if the person responsible for the car fails to disclose who was driving they get whacked with the maximum sentence/fine/points of whatever offence has been committed. So in this case Dangerous driving, failure to stop at the scene.

Doesn't that simply mean that horrible, indecent human beings like this driver will simply use a stooge as the person responsible for the car? That's pretty much what happens already, criminals routinely exploit DOC cover and the car's registered to Mr Homer Simpson.
 

Sara_H

Guru
Doesn't that simply mean that horrible, indecent human beings like this driver will simply use a stooge as the person responsible for the car? That's pretty much what happens already, criminals routinely exploit DOC cover and the car's registered to Mr Homer Simpson.
Maybe, but the stiffer the sentence the less likely someone is to take the wrap. And I suspect some proper investigation by police could unpick most false stories quite quickly.
 
OP
OP
glenn forger

glenn forger

Guest
It's truly mad, the penalty for hit and run is less than that for serious driving offences. So if you are a horrible indecent human being OF COURSE YOU WILL RUN! Same with this, refusing to identify makes loads of sense if you're a worthless person. The penalty is less. Of course they won't identify the driver. Never going to happen as long as scum like this can drive a horse and cart through the law.
 

CaadX

Well-Known Member
It doesn't surprise me. They aren't interested as the civil side of the law will 'sort it' - that's effectively what the police officer said to me - 'your insurance/solicitor will sort it out, despite the severity of your injury'. CBA !
'In cases of momentary lapses of concentration it is not police policy to prosecute drivers !' You may like to check with your local force .
 

steveindenmark

Legendary Member
Gaz, thanks for that. We had a similar case in Denmark recently. It was not a hire car but both parties in the car were insured to drive it.

A new bill needs to go through which in cases like this allows both parties to be charged for the same offence. Obviously one of them was driving and they are using the system to accept lesser charges.
 
Top Bottom