Can cars ever be trusted?

[albion]

Lower speed limits certainly help but the existance of both sleeping policemen and fast increasing car insurance premiums tells us nothing has changed.

Will it ever be different when the war on cycling is mainly there to deflect from far bigger issues?

 

[EltonFrog]

What are you blathering on about?

 

[Ming the Merciless]

Have cars gained artificial intelligence sentience or something?

 

[Sterlo]

I think cars can be trusted, drivers on the other hand...

 

[Punkawallah]

‘The most dangerous part of the car is the nut behind the steering wheel’.

 

[albion]

What are you blathering on about?

Slow going on that Peleton I bet.

 

[Cycleops]

You can trust that what you'll never get rid of is the entitlement of car owners.
Is there a war on cycling? Quite the opposite I'd of have thought. This and the ever increasing cost of car ownership ( congestion charges, fuel cost and insurance) is what is getting up the noses of the motoring public.
So I'd say a lot is changing and has changed.

 

[Drago]

I think Optimus Prime can be trusted, although technically he was a lorry.

 

[Ming the Merciless]

is what is getting up the noses of the motoring public.

What’s getting up everyone’s nose is the pollution from all these bloody cars spreading like viruses.

 

[EltonFrog]

Slow going on that Peleton I bet.

Still non the wiser. You seem to have a record writing utter nonsense. I suggest you take more water with whatever it is you’re drinking.

 

[Ming the Merciless]

Still non the wiser. You seem to have a record writing utter nonsense. I suggest you take more water with whatever it is you’re drinking.

Probably a bot or the posts are being generated out of Chat GPT.

 

[albion]

Probably a bot or the posts are being generated out of Chat GPT

There was an attempt to keep it less political. However, I am sorry. I did not account for it being so mentally challenging.

 

[EltonFrog]

There was an attempt to keep it less political. However, I am sorry. I did not account for it being so mentally challenging.

Go back and edit your the title and original post so that it makes some kind of sense.

 

[albion]

Go back and edit your the title and original post so that it makes some kind of sense.

Ha ha. Better still, put it into politics(ncap) so it cannot get closed or get little replies.
https://ncap.cyclechat.net/forums/news-current-affairs-politics.204/

 

[Time Waster]

Cars are lumps of metal, plastic and glass. As an object you cannot use the idea of trust wrt actions.

Can we stop using car when we should be using terms for the human operator of the car. Cars don't kill, people driving them do!

In the recent thread it was a cyclist that killed a pedestrian not the bicycle. In similar threads involving cars it is the car that killed them. There's no parity in description there where in all fairness there should be.

Either bicycles and cars kill or cyclists and motorists. If the OP wants to make more sense perhaps rephrase things along these lines, namely a human does the action the cycle or car is just the tool to do it in or on.