Flight MS804

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

slowmotion

Quite dreadful
Location
lost somewhere
With high speed telemetry, it's usual to have two way communication "handshaking" to ensure that packets of data are transmitted reliably to base. It's not essential though.
I imagine that the BB technology is hopelessly outdated compared to technological advances in remote telemetry over the last 15 years, but that's just a wild guess.
 

classic33

Leg End Member
With high speed telemetry, it's usual to have two way communication "handshaking" to ensure that packets of data are transmitted reliably to base. It's not essential though.
I imagine that the BB technology is hopelessly outdated compared to technological advances in remote telemetry over the last 15 years, but that's just a wild guess.
Who'd have access to that data though? Manufacturer's or those who deal with the aftermath.

Given the route being flown, there's a fair few unknowns about its location in the the last half hour.
Image2.jpg
 
Last edited:

slowmotion

Quite dreadful
Location
lost somewhere
Who'd have access to that data though? Manufacturer's or those who deal with the aftermath.

Given the route being flown, there's a fair few unknowns about its location in the the last half hour.
I wasn't speculating about any aspect of the current tragedy. I was just suggesting that high speed telemetry is probably capable of giving at least as much data as a "conventional" black box, and probably a lot more reliably and quickly. Given that it takes many, many years to develop a new large aircraft, it's hardly surprising that many aspects of the electronics are hopelessly outdated when the aircraft comes into service.

Edit: I think it would be reckless for the data to have to be made available via the manufacturer for obvious reasons.
 

classic33

Leg End Member
I wasn't speculating about any aspect of the current tragedy. I was just suggesting that high speed telemetry is probably capable of giving at least as much data as a "conventional" black box, and probably a lot more reliably and quickly. Given that it takes many, many years to develop a new large aircraft, it's hardly surprising that many aspects of the electronics are hopelessly outdated when the aircraft comes into service.

Edit: I think it would be reckless for the data to have to be made available via the manufacturer for obvious reasons.
I wasn't referring to recent events either, except for that last part. See edited post to see what I meant.
 

machew

Veteran
Last transmission of errors from the plane

00:26Z 3044 ANTI ICE R WINDOW
00:26Z 561200 R SLIDING WINDOW SENSOR
00:26Z 2600 SMOKE LAVATORY SMOKE
00:27Z 2600 AVIONICS SMOKE
00:28Z 561100 R FIXED WINDOW SENSOR
00:29Z 2200 AUTO FLT FCU 2 FAULT
00:29Z 2700 F/CTL SEC 3 FAULT
 

DaveReading

Don't suffer fools gladly (must try harder!)
Location
Reading, obvs
Given the route being flown, there's a fair few unknowns about its location in the the last half hour.

No, you are misinterpreting that Excel data. It's what happened in the final couple of minutes of the flight (and which caused it to stop transmitting the data) that's unknown. The ADS-B data shows a perfectly normal flight profile right up to the point where the data stops.
 

classic33

Leg End Member
Main locations of plane's wreckage identified
The main locations of wreckage from the EgyptAir jet that crashed in the eastern Mediterranean last month have been identified by a deep ocean search vessel, the Egyptian-led investigation committee says.

Key points:

  • Investigators will now draw up a map of the wreckage locations
  • It was not specified which parts of the plane had been identified
  • Investigators are racing against the clock to find the black boxes which are expected to stop emitting signals on June 24
The John Lethbridge, a search boat contracted by the Egyptian Government, has provided the first images of wreckage to investigators.
 

DaveReading

Don't suffer fools gladly (must try harder!)
Location
Reading, obvs
Actually that's not correct. There are black box systems that can live stream (e.g. the FLYHTStream system from Flyht Aerospace Solutions) and some airlines are retrofitting them - Qatar Airways for example.

Notwithstanding what Al Baker has said, his promise made back in November that the media would "soon" be invited to a live demo of FDR data streaming doesn't seem to have happened yet.

https://www.runwaygirlnetwork.com/2...ays-carrier-already-streaming-black-box-data/

There's no mention of FLYHT's website of Qatar as a customer, which may or may not be significant.
 

Beebo

Firm and Fruity
Location
Hexleybeef
Glad to hear they have found the main wreck site.
I had always assumed the Med was a shallow sea. 3km is a long way down.
 

TVC

Guest
This is an odd one. No attempts to claim responsibility, no checks ordered by the manufacturer or investigation of the operators procedures publicised. It fell off the news pages really quickly and there has been a whole absence of speculation in the usual places.
I don't intend to open up speculation here, but the response to it hasn't followed the pattern of recent years.
 

TVC

Guest
[QUOTE 4325143, member: 45"]It fell off the radar with the press because there's nothing juicy about it. The manufacturers involved in the plane will have started investigating when it hit the water and won't have stopped.[/QUOTE]
Of course there is a a rigorous investigation, it's the lack of reporting and speculation that seems different this time.
 
Top Bottom