Hang on, how come everybody seems to be condeming Jon Snow based on a Daily Mail article? I mean if ever a paper was known for it's anti-cycling standpoint....All you have is a "journalist's" word and some dodgy pictures taken out of context with inflammatory statements next to them (ok the mobile use is bad but still not illegal). Correct me if I am wrong but none of us know where the pics were taken or the situation they were taken in, whether the lights were actually red when Mr. Snow rolled through them or whether the pavements were dual use etc. In one of the pics I can see a cycling route sign in the background!?! I just can't believe that people are taking the Daily Mail for their word without any proper evidence...