deptfordmarmoset
Full time tea drinker
Yes, molested. She's not finger candy.Molested?
Podium model, knows she is there as eye candy. That pic goes round the world because he pinched her bottom and may well land her bigger assignments!
Yes, molested. She's not finger candy.Molested?
Podium model, knows she is there as eye candy. That pic goes round the world because he pinched her bottom and may well land her bigger assignments!
we might not realise it but he will have impacted some of our(the public, not cyclechat) choices of bikes.
Good point, I'd never buy a Trek, overpriced uninviting bikes IMO.That works both ways. I've never considered even looking at a Trek and have tried to talk others out of it too, because of a certain rider's association with them, even before the truth came out.
I know you're not asking me, but that's pretty churlish and petty, if you ask me.That works both ways. I've never considered even looking at a Trek and have tried to talk others out of it too, because of a certain rider's association with them, even before the truth came out.
Fair enough. In that case I agree with you.Not considering how Trek treated Greg Lemond on Armstrong's say so. Those were not the actions of a principled company. If we don't vote with our cash then corporations will continue to behave without principles. It wasn't just because Armstrong was riding the bikes, the relationship was far deeper than that.
shoot, i know what race he was in but i planned on watching it tomorrow.that win was pretty brilliant
Sure was!that win was pretty brilliant
Bad luck, but think that is one time when the spoiler convention doesn't apply!s***, i know what race he was in but i planned on watching it tomorrow.
I'll still watch tomorrow morning. From 25k on, golden rule.Sure was!
Bad luck, but think that is one time when the spoiler convention doesn't apply!