That was an interesting but rather depressing read. A couple of the comments did raise what I had thought though, i.e.There's no mention of number of riders, number of races, or whether there are now higher averages or more hazardous courses.Whether they have improved things or not is aslo questionable
http://davesbikeblog.squarespace.com/blog/2011/6/21/pro-cycling-and-helmets.html
Agreed.Which is why I won't say they are worse, only questionable. They unfortunately are not a ringing endorsement of mandation.
...introduction is relatively recent.
Because they get paid a lot of money to wear them. They then become fashionable and slaves to fashion won't go on a bike without one, under the misapprehension that they will somehow protect them from head injuries in the event of a crash. IMHO..Why do the pros wear helmets, is it because they keep on falling off?
It would be interesting to calculate the accident/km ratio for, say, TdF participants over the length of the event and compare to commuting/utility cycling rates. I would not be surprised if it were an order of magnitude higherWhy do the pros wear helmets, is it because they keep on falling off?