A bit thick, isn't it? Nigel, if you're reading this (I'm not holding my breath on that one) it's a bit like watching and disliking one of your sitcoms and deciding not to watch anymore TV on that basis - or reading a poor article and deciding to boycott a newspaper as a result.
And the really thick bit is trying to stereotype the country's several million cyclists. We are all prone to stereotyping, it's a human trait (I've just done it myself, in saying that). We like to organise and pigeonhole information and people. It can be fun, but it's rarely fair and when we discriminate on the grounds of race, gender or disability, the underlying stereotyping, which usually drives the prejudice, is actually illegal.
Of course, stereotyping is common amongst Road users - we all know what the stereotypical white van man is like, or the taxi driver or the BMW/Volvo/Range Rover etc driver. And, in the majority of cases, stereotyping by vehicle, or indeed any other criteria is totally unfair and inaccurate.
Sadly, however, I think the stereotyping of cyclists is altogether more damaging. It not only tries to marginalise and ridicule the largest and most vulnerable minority on the roads (I exclude pedestrians as non-road users). It also undermines the credibility and even the legality of the one form of transport which could genuinely make a contribution to reducing the ecological impact of road use - the one form of transport which we ought to be actively encouraging and making easier and more socially acceptable.
http://www.britishcycling.org.uk/web/site/BC/bcf/News2007/20070204_times.asp