wiggydiggy
Legendary Member
.
Last edited:
Should insurance for cyclists on organised events be mandatory
a car deciding to drive on the other side of the road because of a build up of traffic would get zero sympathy from anyone and does rather make it sound like the important thing to him was to maintain speed
Yeah I watched a video a while back - dash cam youtube channel - of a car that overtook another on the wrong side of an island and plowed down a pedestrian. I've got experience of it myself where I have been cycling past an island and cars have overtaken on the wrong side.
The ride was organised by his club.
Actually I though club membership comes with 3rd party insurance. I looked up my local club and they have it in place for members, this one (Muswell Hill Peloton club) doesn't make it clear on their website if they do or not.

Yeah I watched a video a while back - dash cam youtube channel - of a car that overtook another on the wrong side of an island and plowed down a pedestrian. I've got experience of it myself where I have been cycling past an island and cars have overtaken on the wrong side.
The ride was organised by his club.
Actually I though club membership comes with 3rd party insurance. I looked up my local club and they have it in place for members, this one (Muswell Hill Peloton club) doesn't make it clear on their website if they do or not.
Ah, there was a central island/reservation for pedestrians, there was me thinking for a moment that passing slow/stopped traffic on my side of the road by riding on the other side was just called overtaking!![]()
I didn't realise it was the same club, they do link the article in the one I put above and the original article does name the same club. But this one doesn't mention its the same club both times.
Someone should be stepping in and looking at how they organise their rides and what advice they give their members. Their website mentions that [Muswell Hill Peloton club] is affiliated to British Cycling, maybe they should be stepping in?
"I have little doubt his bike cost way more than the £500 fine he has received for the offence. But, the fact this man is a cyclist without insurance means he has got away with it. Solicitors are not prepared to fight such cases for victims because cyclists do not have insurance."
That statement by the victim makes no sense to me, if rider didn't have any insurance, the rider has to find the funds themselves if found guilty of an offence.
I presume the solicitor is thinking that payment would come from the rider
and if the rider doesn;t have the funds them he might not get paid
which is morally wrong
but how many of us would have done our job for nothing for several days (or more) if it helped someone else who was morally in the right?
If the club was British Cycling affliated at the time of the incident then any solicitor would have been able to claim against that surely? I think either it didn't at the time or she's been given bad advice.