I remember that wa sthe system when I did my "O" and "A" levels. Seems to me a fair assumption that candidate capability across a large number of students & schools will not change dramatically year on year. Whereas difficulty of exam papers does.When I did my school exams the marking basis was the top x% got an A, the next B and so on.This was good for differentiating who was best at a certain subjects.
I remember that wa sthe system when I did my "O" and "A" levels. Seems to me a fair assumption that candidate capability across a large number of students & schools will not change dramatically year on year. Whereas difficulty of exam papers does.
Each year I am disappointed when we get reports that "record number of eg "As" or "best results yet" or "better than last year". Does anybody really think students sitting this year are significantly more talented than those last year or that teaching this year is much better than last year? To me the "record number of ...", etc. just denigrates the exam system.
Discoverys disgourging over excited teens
The increasing inability of 18 year old teens to walk is a worry trend.
When i was a lad,after my results the careers officer said Mee boy there is a village looking to offer you a job.
That post has gone. I had a great 40 yesterday career as village idiot.
Vacancy for village drunk?