presta
Legendary Member
But if you've only vaccinated say 10% of the population, then you've only reduced the risk by 10%.You’re right. You’re not.
It’s about minimising the spread and the risk, not creating immunity.
But if you've only vaccinated say 10% of the population, then you've only reduced the risk by 10%.You’re right. You’re not.
It’s about minimising the spread and the risk, not creating immunity.
Which in theory will reduce the impact at A&E as you don't have high risk people being taken in and using up precious bed space...That’s not what the ‘flu vaccination programme is aimed at doing. It’s about reducing the potential impacts for the high risk groups - children, the old and those with particular comorbidities. That’s done by giving the jab to those groups and to health/social care workers in contact with those groups.
I can think of one certain cure. However the authorities tend to frown on shooting people, even those as odious as the self-satisfied, smug, unspeakable upper class shoot* Rees-Mogg!That's a disease that's so pernicious and all pervading amongst certain sections of society that immunologists haven't been able to come up with a vaccine as yet.
But someone with diabetes say, is at greater risk of harm to themselves if they catch flu, but they're not at greater risk of catching it (and therefore not a greater risk to others).If you vaccinate those at risk of transmitting i.e. front line health workers and others who are vulnerable then you reduce the risk by more than the absolute number.
Isn't that always the way in supermarkets when just going in for milk though!??Just had mine done in Asda's, surprised that they could do it straight away with no appointment. Only went in for some milk.
Plus someone who develops full blown 'flu increases the risk of transmission to others. Which is one reason why those who work with vulnerable groups in health and social care are offered the vaccination each year.
No square ones?Had my flu jab today. Was like at school all lined up.
The rumour went around that they had run out of small needles and only had huge ones left........ Thankfully fake news lol
No, you're missing the point. Someone with diabetes who doesn't vaccinate is no more of a risk to others than the non-diabetic majority who are also unvaccinated.You're missing the point... If someone with diabetes catches 'flu (and I mean proper 'flu not some sniffles) and they have not been vaccinated, then they are at risk of doing significant damage to themselves - damage that will in all likelihood cost the NHS much more than the cost of the jab to put right.
Plus someone who develops full blown 'flu increases the risk of transmission to others. Which is one reason why those who work with vulnerable groups in health and social care are offered the vaccination each year.
I think that the point being made is that those with pre existing medical conditions who contract influenza will cost the NHS considerably more than a generally healthy person to put right. You also need to consider the additional strain on NHS services such as ICU's and A&E departments in what is already stretched departments.No, you're missing the point. Someone with diabetes who doesn't vaccinate is no more of a risk to others than the non-diabetic majority who are also unvaccinated.