BBC and Glastonbury

[Beebo]

So why are they making the set available on iPlayer? What’s the difference between showing it lived and delayed, in terms of legality or liability?

Is the set on Iplayer edited?
Does it include the chants about Starmer?
I genuinely don’t know.

 

[glasgowcyclist]

Is the set on Iplayer edited?
Does it include the chants about Starmer?
I genuinely don’t know.

I don’t know if it’s edited either. I read they’d announced the decision to only show them on iPlayer before they’d been on stage, so I guess it’s nothing to do with what they chanted about Starmer.

 

[Beebo]

The contrast between Niel Young and Charlie CCX could be much greater.

one is hitting hard. The other is just dull.

 

[Bonefish Blues]

So why are they making the set available on iPlayer? What’s the difference between showing it lived and delayed, in terms of legality or liability?

Because there may be something said that should not be broadcast.

 

[Bonefish Blues]

Is the set on Iplayer edited?
Does it include the chants about Starmer?
I genuinely don’t know.

If necessary.

Question Time is recorded and broadcast 'as live' for the same reason.

 

[glasgowcyclist]

Because there may be something said that should not be broadcast.

That could have been accommodated with a 20 second delay. And it was bound to happen that some other act mentioned the unmentionable, so that’s not the reason (IMHO).

 

[midlandsgrimpeur]

The contrast between Niel Young and Charlie CCX could be much greater.

one is hitting hard. The other is just dull.

But which is which? To declare my personal bias I am watching Neil Young.

 

[Bonefish Blues]

That could have been accommodated with a 20 second delay. And it was bound to happen that some other act mentioned the unmentionable, so that’s not the reason (IMHO).

A twenty second delay with the only option to cut transmission when the lawyer on standby watching the feed says so.

I'm not entirely convinced that is a viable option. Are you?

 

[Dogtrousers]

The contrast between Niel Young and Charlie CCX could be much greater.

one is hitting hard. The other is just dull.

I wonder which was which.

Personally I've never had much time for Neil Young, although he was popular with some people I knew at university so I did hear him rather more that I would have liked. I watched 5 minutes of him tonight before the excitement of loading the dishwasher lured me away. All a matter of taste.

Charlie xcx is new to me, I'll catch on iPlayer tomorrow.

I enjoyed Pulp and Ezra Collective earlier.

 

[Beebo]

But which is which? To declare my personal bias I am watching Neil Young.

He seems to have forgotten his lighting rig. And any level of energy.
I would much prefer to be at Charlie XCX. It’s got energy and fun.

 

[glasgowcyclist]

A twenty second delay with the only option to cut transmission when the lawyer on standby watching the feed says so.

I'm not entirely convinced that is a viable option. Are you?

I’m sure experienced journalistic employees at the beeb know what their employer would want broadcast or not. No need for a lawyer but they could easily afford one if they felt it necessary.

 

[Bonefish Blues]

I’m sure experienced journalistic employees at the beeb know what their employer would want broadcast or not. No need for a lawyer but they could easily afford one if they felt it necessary.

That's wrong.

 

[glasgowcyclist]

That's wrong.

Which part and why?

 

[midlandsgrimpeur]

He seems to have forgotten his lighting rig. And any level of energy.
I would much prefer to be at Charlie XCX. It’s got energy and fun.

I like Charlie but to be fair, Neil is one of my all time music favourites. Will watch CXCX on catch up tomorrow.

 

[Bonefish Blues]

Which part and why?

Your logic, in each one of our exchanges.

I've patiently explained my position. You think there's a conspiracy of some kind. That's your prerogative, but I'm out, thanks.