Best cycling city for 2010

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Is Bristol apparently ..

or at least it is in the cycling plus magazine, yet in last months magazine Bristol was getting slagged of for not spending the 23 million £££'s it recieved for its cycling city status ?

Simon
 

rich p

ridiculous old lush
Location
Brighton
Well, maybe the competition wasn't too stiff, Simon. Brighton was a cycling city and the only visible signs were 2 useless cycle lanes.
How did they judge it? Cycle lanes, decent drivers, lack of hills?
 

summerdays

Cycling in the sun
Location
Bristol
rich p said:
Well, maybe the competition wasn't too stiff, Simon. Brighton was a cycling city and the only visible signs were 2 useless cycle lanes.
How did they judge it? Cycle lanes, decent drivers, lack of hills?

Well Bristol wouldn't win on those grounds:biggrin:

I don't think they have spent that much money on paint - I can't think of very much painted lines going in anywhere in the city. The paths they are working on tend to be improving muddy tracks (not running beside roads) that join up areas that are useful. There are a couple of paths next to busy roads that they are working on too but no not painted lanes.
 
Hilldodger said:
Which cities were in the top 20?

Top 20 [best to worst]

1. Bristol
2. Nottingham
3. Leicester [LOL]
4. Manchester
5. Edinburgh
6. Newcastle
7. Stoke on Trent
8. Cardiff
9. Swansea
10. Plymouth
11. Coventry
12. Belfast
13. Liverpool
14. Hull
15. Leeds
16. Sheffield
17. London
18. Glasgow
19. Birmingham
20. Bradford

And here are the criteria:
Air quality; road hazards; litter levels; No of CTC members; BC members; cycle commuters; bike thefts; cycling casualties; average rainfall!!!!!!!; traffic free routes; national cycle network; cyclescheme participants; independant bike shops; sportives within 1hrs drive / 50mls.

:biggrin:
 
Like you I'm still laughing, I think they must have just looked at Watermead Park when it wasn't flooded.
 
Top Bottom