Bizarre incident of car following a bike on the pavement...

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Sheffield_Tiger

Legendary Member
Not me...a mate has just been telling me of his ride home this morning (he works nights)

About 7am he passed a car that was stopped in the middle of the road, to answer the phone. The car moves off as he passes but follows (up a hill that's a pain, it doesn't look steep but it is)

He needed to turn right a few hundred hards up the road, and feeling uneasy at the car behind on his back wheel making no attempt to pass when passing was possible, he decided to cross over and ride the 200yds to the junction on the opposite pavement, to get out of the way of a strangely-behaving motorist/

This is where it gets odd. The car followed. Up the kerb, onto the pavement and with a fence to the right and parked cars to the left, the car continues to drive up the pavement, when it meets with a lamp post the car scrapes (literally) by the school fence.

Eventually they come to a white van parked half on the pavement making the gap too narrow for the car. He's freaked out by the experience so didn't stop to see whether the car's stopping was due to recognition of the narrow gap or a collision.

My first thought was that the driver was so inebriated..the lack of a "threatening behaviour", just a blind following of the thing in front, made me think that the driver was completely out of it.

The police were disinterested and asked a cyclist who was worrying about being run over, to go back and take a reg no. and offered to come out to visit at 4pm - 8 hrs later - for what?

I think, after tonight's discussion of this, next week there will be another cyclist equipped with a camera
 

quassleberry

New Member
Location
East Yorks
I had to read this twice to take it in, 3 words "what the hell".
No wonder he was freaked out I would've been.
The response from the police is disgusting, it could have been a youngster on their paper round who didn't have the presence of mind to take evasive action.
Pity he didn't get the reg.
 

Hydra

Occasional Pepper Carver
Location
Sheffield
That is properly peculiar. It's a shame your friend didn't get a good look after the van.

Perhaps it was intended to intimidate the cyclist for some reason?

Where abouts (if in Sheff) was this?
 

Panter

Just call me Chris...
That is properly peculiar. It's a shame your friend didn't get a good look after the van.

Perhaps it was intended to intimidate the cyclist for some reason?

Where abouts (if in Sheff) was this?

It does sound a bit like this to me.
I would've thought that if the driver was really that hammered, that they wouldn't have made it that far up the footpath?

Scary stuff...
 

trsleigh

Well-Known Member
Location
Ealing
The police were disinterested and asked a cyclist who was worrying about being run over, to go back and take a reg no. and offered to come out to visit at 4pm - 8 hrs later - for what?

Sorry,can't help it, but please uninterested.
Phew, that's better.
smile.gif
 

Sh4rkyBloke

Jaffa Cake monster
Location
Manchester, UK
Sorry,can't help it, but please uninterested.
Phew, that's better.
smile.gif
I think disinterested is actually the "correct" word but not many use it.... but I may be wrong (it has been known). :whistle:
 

Lurker

Senior Member
Location
London
Surely 'uninterested' is correct here? In that the police weren't interested, even though they should have been. 'Disinterested' means 'impartial' i.e. without a vested interest in the outcome. One would hope that the police would always be disinterested in carrying out their work - but they should certainly be interested in any situation where someone is injured or nearly injured, or other crime has been committed.
 

trsleigh

Well-Known Member
Location
Ealing
Surely 'uninterested' is correct here? In that the police weren't interested, even though they should have been. 'Disinterested' means 'impartial' i.e. without a vested interest in the outcome. One would hope that the police would always be disinterested in carrying out their work - but they should certainly be interested in any situation where someone is injured or nearly injured, or other crime has been committed.

+1 Thanks Lurker, good definition.
 

Davidc

Guru
Location
Somerset UK
From what I've read of the effects of talking on 'phones while driving I'd suspect that the driver was concentrating on the 'phone call and driving the van using entirely his subconscious mind, just following the vehicle in front without consciously processing what he was doing.

Did your friend have lights on, and were they flashing? If he had lights on then, again from what I've read, the driver was possibly following the light rather than the bike.

The flashing question is because of the reasoning behind the German ban on flashing bike lights. As with most things German it's well researched and has a logical reason behind it. They found that although under some circumstances flashing lights can give quicker or better response from a driver, under other circumstances they have a hypnotic effect, particularly if for any reason the driver's attention is distracted away from the road. Perhaps this was one of those events?

(BTW, I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with the German ban, just repeating some of what I read of the reasoning behind it)

I think that police response is a disgrace. That could have been terrifying for some people. I wouldn't have been too happy myself.
 

marinyork

Resting in suspended Animation
Location
Logopolis
I wouldn't necessarily think it was down to inebriation, drivers driving on the pavement is a lot more common that people generally realise. Name and shame the road please!
 

dellzeqq

pre-talced and mighty
Location
SW2
Surely 'uninterested' is correct here? In that the police weren't interested, even though they should have been. 'Disinterested' means 'impartial' i.e. without a vested interest in the outcome. One would hope that the police would always be disinterested in carrying out their work - but they should certainly be interested in any situation where someone is injured or nearly injured, or other crime has been committed.
bothered?

Did he not get the number? It's difficult to see what the police can do without having some means of identifying the van or the driver.
 
OP
OP
Sheffield_Tiger

Sheffield_Tiger

Legendary Member
I wouldn't necessarily think it was down to inebriation, drivers driving on the pavement is a lot more common that people generally realise. Name and shame the road please!

I think it was East Bank Road or just off it - at first I thought he meant Gleadless Road

As for getting the number, it's easier if you are following a car than if the car is following you...
 
Top Bottom