bluetooth or ant + for sensors ?

[cyberknight]

X mas time i am looking to get a new bike computer

The two models i have been looking at both have more than enough functions except the cheaper version only supports Bluetooth whereas the latter does ant+ and Bluetooth ,

The only sensor i run is cadence atm so as long as i can get cadence im happy although the cheaper version means i would need to buy a new sensor as afaik i can use my current sensors with the latter.
Looking at the lezyne macro and super gps

 

[Ming the Merciless]

I got a bluetooth HR strap to go with my smart trainer. A bonus is that it works with my phone and iPad. So down to your preferences really. I have found it to be reliable on rides if just using Strava on phone rather than GPS.

 

[cyberknight]

I got a bluetooth HR strap to go with my smart trainer. A bonus is that it works with my phone and iPad. So down to your preferences really. I have found it to be reliable on rides if just using Strava on phone rather than GPS.

I dont use my phone , mind you i dont use any data unless i have wi-fi

 

[Ming the Merciless]

I dont use my phone , mind you i dont use any data unless i have wi-fi

Well I didn't but a bluetooth sensor opens up a whole host of apps. Plus you do not need data or wifi turned on to use bluetooth or the apps.

 

[cyberknight]

or pushing the boat out a bit a garmin 130 ?

 

[HLaB]

Ive got one of those bluetooth/ant + HRM's and for some it always works with the bluetooth on the phone but my Edge 130 usually picks up the ant + (occasionally it will pick up the bluetooth but always the ant +). The bluetooth to my phone for syncing is poor too. IME the 130 prefers ant + despite it saying its Bluetooth capable :-/

 

[cyberknight]

Looks like the super gps supports my sensors so if i can get it and has a bigger screen size, no brainer?