Arch said:Oh right, so it matters does it?
(speaking as someone who probably also has a face for radio...)
linfordlunchbox said:I've seen your face and it's not so bad. You are very hard upon yourself Arch
Arch said:Thank you. Maybe I am. But I just think Andrew Marr's skill as a presenter far outweighs consideration of his looks. Perhaps it's just that I'm attracted to intelligence above all else..
linfordlunchbox said:youngest offspring gets so much agro she won't even walk the dog for fear of comment from passing car drivers/lads in the street etc)

TheDoctor said:LLB, was there ever a thread that you didn't turn into your own little ill-informed rant-fest?
Just curious...

milo said:I have had him on my ignore list for ages but I can guess what hes ranting about.
Poor fool.

Arch said:Thank you. Maybe I am. But I just think Andrew Marr's skill as a presenter far outweighs consideration of his looks. Perhaps it's just that I'm attracted to intelligence above all else..

Intelligence, and/or personality come first, and then looks are the least consideration. It is no good being handsome, if you have not got a smiling face, and twinkly eyes.
And a nice friendly voice. 

Same here. I tend to find intelligence in itself attractive and then attribute the appearance of the person to that attractiveness (means I think you are lovely, ArchArch said:Perhaps it's just that I'm attracted to intelligence above all else..
). Also I cannot find a person attractive, no matter how they look, if they are not intelligent.