mgarl10024
Über Member
- Location
- Bristol
So, I needed to commute 5.8 miles today, and having a cold I thought I'd have a day off the bike.
Bus 1 was about 10 minutes late, which meant that I missed connecting Bus 2. But that didn't matter as Bus 2 runs every 15 minutes. Except two in a row failed to show and almost 45 minutes later I'm still at the bus stop. Overall, that 5.8 miles commute took me 1h 55 minutes. I literally could have walked it faster.
On the way home, Bus 1 was a little late. Bus 2 (which runs every 15 minutes) also failed to show twice. Return commute was 1h 30mins.
When the bike (even at my snail-like pace) takes 33 minutes; gets me out in the fresh air; gets me the odd cheery hello off a fellow cyclist; gets me exercise; and costs less than the bus - it's a clear winner.
I reckon I'd rather be on the side of the road in the rain repairing a puncture than go through today's commute again.
Bus 1 was about 10 minutes late, which meant that I missed connecting Bus 2. But that didn't matter as Bus 2 runs every 15 minutes. Except two in a row failed to show and almost 45 minutes later I'm still at the bus stop. Overall, that 5.8 miles commute took me 1h 55 minutes. I literally could have walked it faster.
On the way home, Bus 1 was a little late. Bus 2 (which runs every 15 minutes) also failed to show twice. Return commute was 1h 30mins.
When the bike (even at my snail-like pace) takes 33 minutes; gets me out in the fresh air; gets me the odd cheery hello off a fellow cyclist; gets me exercise; and costs less than the bus - it's a clear winner.
I reckon I'd rather be on the side of the road in the rain repairing a puncture than go through today's commute again.