Calling all keen photographers.

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Grant Fondo

Legendary Member
Location
Cheshire
I started out with one of these:

View attachment 154836

(Note how you could take photos whether it was sunny or overcast.)
Yes that kind of technology was ground breaking...
 

DaveReading

Don't suffer fools gladly (must try harder!)
Location
Reading, obvs
Having said that, I learnt to take photos with a Kodak Instamatic that took 126 film cartridges. It was as basic as it got; fixed focal length, fixed shutter speed and two aperture settings. The prints were grainy in anything that wasn't taken in the best light, but I learnt a hell of a lot about photography.

Cartridge film cameras were for wimps - real men (well, 14-year old boys) used these:

Vintage-Kodak-Brownie-Vecta-127-Roll-Film-Camera.jpg


:smile:
 
Ooooh, I have one of those! :smile:
 
OP
OP
gavroche

gavroche

Getting old but not past it
Location
North Wales
Just bought a 70-300 mm F4-5.6 Sigma DG Macro Lens for my Nikon D3300 and a tripod too. Hope to try it out soon. If you have one too, what are your views on the Sigma?
 

potsy

Rambler
Location
My Armchair
Just bought a 70-300 mm F4-5.6 Sigma DG Macro Lens for my Nikon D3300 and a tripod too. Hope to try it out soon. If you have one too, what are your views on the Sigma?
How are you getting on with the camera gavroche?

I am just about ready to buy myself a dslr, have one on loan at the minute to try out.
 

Profpointy

Legendary Member
This thread has got me inspired to play with film cameras again. A few years back I got a bit carried away buying up classic film cameras on ebay as they were so cheap. When it first came out my ex's Nikon F90x was nearly a grand. I got one on fleabay for £17. The more classic metal cameras are a bit more but still. Not that I'm really a photographer but I do like the engineering and precision of the older kit.

Regarding modern compact cameras mobile phones have more or less destroyed the cheap to medium end of the market. Wanted to replace a broken £200 digital compact (a very good canon) but couldn't really get anything in the same niche for less than £300 (albeit the with higher spec). Needed a particular set of features for underwater pics. Ended up buying a 2nd exact same model rather than upgrading
 
Just bought a 70-300 mm F4-5.6 Sigma DG Macro Lens for my Nikon D3300 and a tripod too. Hope to try it out soon. If you have one too, what are your views on the Sigma?
The Pentax version gets mixed reviews, which you'd kind of expect for this range of lens but some of the pics posted looked pretty good. It's sweet spot seems to be F8 in the middle of the zoom range and most people said avoid the extreme ends of the zoom. Lot of lens for the money and if the light is good you should get good results. Like any lens it will have limitations and you need to learn what they are. So a few test at different zooms and apertures will soon teach you what it is capable of. Here's the reviews for the Pentax version of the Sigma. Concentrate on the positives.

https://www.pentaxforums.com/userreviews/sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-macro.html
 

glasgowcyclist

Charming but somewhat feckless
Location
Scotland

That's not a telephoto lens, this is a telephoto lens.

Canon 5200mm F14 Prime Lens:
canon.jpg


The Canon 5200mm F14 Prime is the worlds largest known SLR lens, and you’ll probably never see one in real life. It is believed that only three of these monster lenses were ever produced, and all are in the hands of private owners.

The 5200mm Prime, which was manufactured in Japan, has insane zoom distances. It is designed to focus on objects 18 to 32 miles away.
 
Top Bottom