Yes.
Second tallest in the UK (as
@subaqua says, the Dartford crossing is the tallest). The cables are basically a parabola (exactly so if you ignore self weight, if you want the exact solution it's a catenary*, but the parabola is a good enough approximation). y=x squared. So as you increase x, the span, y, the height, goes up much worse than linearly. Hence long spans end up with ridiculously tall towers. (Exception: valley crossings where the ends are on the raised land at the sides of the valley. Our line out to Dinorwic and Wylfa crosses the Aber Valley with one of our longer spans but it doesn't look so spectacular because the pylons are quite normal. ) Plus the clearance at the low point in the middle usually has to be higher for ships than the standard clearance for on-land which is based round combine harvesters.
That is our original 275kV line to Wales. When the time came to expand to a 400 kV crossing as well, we did that with a tunnel instead. They actually cross over each other in the no-mans-land of the Bristol Channel. We also tunneled under the Solent at Fawley and the Medway to avoid using these massive pylons, and there are tunnels under the Thames as well as the overhead line at Dartford.
Boy, those drinks at the drinks reception taste good
* I did catenaries from first principles in maths at school. 15 years later, having crossed a rope suspension bridge in Nepal, I lay awake in my sleeping bag that night trying to rederive the equations. And failed dismally. Now, another 15 years on, not only could I not derive them, I can't even remember what they look like...