Spoked Wheels
Legendary Member
- Location
- Bournemouth
There's your answer then. The history has been kept, so fear not. It'll just take them some time to get it loaded.
If you've any experience of IT projects, and it sounds as though you have, you'll be aware that things don't always, achem, 'go to plan', so to speak. If it's like any project I've been involved with, it's the new whizzo front-end features (invariably sales related/driven) that get concentrated on, tested and talked about. The back end stuff, the legacy data etc is forever the neglected, red-headed stepchild. Doesn't make it right of course.
I agree, sadly that it's what matters to CRC in this case too.
Sack the technical director. That's what we'd have done..did..
Probably that was a business decision that the technical director didn't make.
Though in fairness asterix, Chain Reaction may have planned it this way. Or had to reschedule implementation, or discovered a problem with the data migration but gone ahead with the other phases, or any number of other things.
The important thing is that they have not lost the data and do intend to bring it over. I'd agree 100% that it's less than ideal, and certainly not the way I'd do it (I'd aim for as seamless as possible a change over), but there you go.
Loosing the data would not have been acceptable. unthinkable to be honest.
For all we know, it was a contracted out task, the contractors dropped the ball and are getting a right good talking to as we speak. Again, doesn't help CC clients.
A requirement analysis oversight would be the worst case scenario most likely they run out of time.