Arch said:
Somewhen, between the end of WW2 and now, we in Britain got obsessed with having a car, and the idea that if you don't, you're a failure. That's the problem.
Agreed, we did what we always do and followed the USA, and what's worrying about that is they have lower cycling rates than we do,
A couple of things occur to me, a motorist who is a also a cyclist will [I hope] always give a bike plenty of room. So, the more people we can get to ride a bike, the safer it gets. Even if a car driver doesn't ride they will get used to being around a lot of cyclists. This was a case in point when I lived outside Cambridge, yes ok you had a lot of numpty students on bikes but cars always seemed less impatient there. Where I live now there are far fewer cyclists and cars drive faster and come a lot closer. The number of journeys to work by bike here, from observation, I suspect is woefully few.
The other important point is that cycling as a sport is broadcast and followed on mainstream tv in most countries on the continent. Go to virtually any Western European country and joe public knows the names of the top cyclists. In other words these guys and girls who compete on a bike are looked up to and are as well known as footballers are here.
So long as the media in general ignore our sport [not all but most] with the exception of the Olympics and World Championships, [and then only on the track] we don't have a hope. Well perhaps one, high profile celebs riding bikes, as a celebrity obsessed nation it's something the media can hardly ignore, to see one on a bike has an effect out of all proportion to the action.
Phew! wasn't going to write much
