Clumsy commuter considers choices: any advice?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

ShinyDave

New Member
So, here's the situation:
I'm moving to start a new job in a few weeks, and have a seventeen-mile round-trip commute, mostly along straight urban main roads once you get out of the hilly bit around where I'll be living. That is, assuming I'll be cycling it - and with a monthly season ticket costing the thick end of eighty quid for what is not a long journey, you'd better believe I want to cycle it.

The problem is that I'm sufficiently clumsy to be rather anxious about losing my balance even on regular on-road cycling - not enough to put me off commuting (I did so before for a previous job - an eleven-mile round-trip - on a Carrera Subway, and when that was nicked, a colleague's ill-fitting and disused MTB), but enough to compromise my choice of bike.

I think my main requirements are something that's light enough to not be sluggish on the longish commute I have, but with wide tyres and definitely-not-twitchy handling. (And if something's got to give, it's the former, not the latter. No point having a fast bike if I'm scared witless to ride it.) The Cannondale Quick 4 seems a possibility, but the Boardman Hybrid Comp looks like a very nice commuter, and I understand that there's clearance for wider tyres than the 28c set that's there as standard (apparently they've fitted 35c Schwalbes to one before, and I'd be looking to do the same if that's possible).

Seeing as I have plenty of savings and even a £1k bike would damned near pay for itself in a year even without the leisure potential I'd get out of it, I'd probably be willing to stretch to that (nothing to do with C2W either - as it's a new job I don't think I'd be eligible for it, not to mention the horror stories I've heard about Cyclescheme on here), but it seems like most of the bikes that are stable enough for my purposes cost a lot less than that anyway.

Any suggestions?
 

Cyclist33

Guest
Location
Warrington
Ive had my Quick 3 for five days and it would make an excellent choice for your commute. I venture the boardman is probably quicker but in a sense that boils down to gears fitness and tyres. The Quick 3 is no slouch. The quick 2 is even lighter and its faster as it has a road bike chainset.

Go and test ride, tis the only way of knowing whats right for you.

Stu
 
OP
OP
S

ShinyDave

New Member
Cheers, Stu. I'd agree that there are plenty of factors involved - and tyres are definitely the area where I'd trade speed for something else (stability, for a start, and also puncture protection).

Definitely going to go for a number of test rides - probably up at the Evans showroom in Gatwick, which I can get to easily enough.
 

gaz

Cycle Camera TV
Location
South Croydon
Have you tried to ride a bicycle with thin tyres?
Balance works just the same on thin tyres as it does thick.
 
OP
OP
S

ShinyDave

New Member
Gaz - I did end up on a road bike once. Didn't fall off, actually (whereas I did fall off a Pinnacle cheapie I test-rode last year!), but did feel a little bit out of control. This goes back to Stu's point about the importance of test rides, doesn't it?

With that said, wiggydiggy has a good point on the Quick being on offer. It's definitely a huge tempter (I think the medium will just about fit me at 5'10", although I'm not sure about inside leg).
 

Cyclist33

Guest
Location
Warrington
Yep it depends on your own bodys geometry! The Quicks are on the small side tho so dont be surprised if the large fits ypu better....
 
OP
OP
S

ShinyDave

New Member
And sadly the large is discontinued from the 2011 ranges :sad:
The height values are misquoted on there, but the Quick 5 values look about right and have 5'10" as the ceiling for medium: http://www.evanscycles.com/products/cannondale/quick-5-2011-hybrid-bike-ec025277
The 2012 model is available in large, but it's £600 and has 32c tyres - I'd probably rather get the Boardman for £100 less and fit 32s on that. The 38s on the 2011 model were a big selling point for me.
 

jonathanw

Chorlton and the Wheelies
Location
The Frozen North
I'd recommend a Genesis Croix de Fer, for your under £1k (just, although you can get a 2011 for much cheaper)

It's a steel frame, very comfortable and durable
Disc brakes, which are bomb-proof and durable - Avid BB7's now on the 2012
Comes with 35mm continental tyres which can be swapped for 25/28/30/32mm tyres depending on what you are after - i use 30mm schwalbe marathon racers
takes mudguards which are essential
will take any standard disc specific pannier rack

I've done nearly 10,000miles on mine commuting and it has been one of the best bikes I've ever owned. The aluminium Genesis vapour now also comes with discs too.
 
OP
OP
S

ShinyDave

New Member
That does seem like a possible idea. Although I was *expecting* a flat-bar to be my choice, that's mostly because I've wrongly conflated "drop bar" with "scary twitchy road bike" - the cross-inspired utility bikes don't fit that bill, and definitely make sense for longer commutes.

The 2012 comes in at £1099 from what I've seen, and I've not been able to find a 2011 for sale. Still, thanks for directing me along that path - the Tricross might be another option, that comes with 32s.
 
OP
OP
S

ShinyDave

New Member
Which, alas, I'm not (5'10" and a tiddly bit), so it'd be the 2012 if I went that way.
Much to consider, and I think that the only way I'll find out is test-riding. This is where Evans come into their own, I gather. :smile:
 

vickster

Squire
Any good LBS should let you test ride models in stock - Evans have the advantage that they have lots of models (and presumably can get stock in of a specific bike, although they may take a deposit). Where are you based?
 
Top Bottom