Levo-Lon
Guru
Last edited:
Why did they kill the croc when it was only doing as nature intended?
The report says it was because it was in an area where humans and pets frequent. It's Australia; you're going to get crocs and other creatures that are going to do you harm if you get near them!
How did they know they had killed the croc responsible, BEFORE they cut it open? Lastly, if they killed it "humanely" as reported, why didn't they just sedate it and transport it away from human habitation?
I'm not normally a big supporter of animal rights, but this stinks a bit.
It doesn't mention that in the report though! It just says she was taken to hospital for emergency surgery, which I assumed from the report was required to stop the bleeding.they killed it to get the limb back ...its been reattached by surgery..amaizing story..
It doesn't mention that in the report though! It just says she was taken to hospital for emergency surgery, which I assumed from the report was required to stop the bleeding.
You didn't read the first line of the report?It doesn't mention that in the report though! It just says she was taken to hospital for emergency surgery, which I assumed from the report was required to stop the bleeding.
Yes. Please tell me where it says her hand/forearm were re-attached!You didn't read the first line of the report?
A WOMAN’S hand and forearm have been found in the stomach of a crocodile that was killed after an attack in Western Australia’s Kimberley region.
Crocodile attack: Hunt for animal after woman loses hand in Wyndham
Still no mention of any re-attaching of hand/forearm, @Marmion .This is the bbc version @Brandane ..ill change the original link..
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-35308162
I retain my ability to make connections (no pun intended) between things stated and actual events, and do not rely on journalists explaining everything to meStill no mention of any re-attaching of hand/forearm, @Marmion .