Cycling up the Thames

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Cuchilo

Prize winning member X2
Location
London
The link doesn't work for me but if its anything to do with actually cycling on the water then I wouldn't dare . Ive been into London on my motor boat and when the big boys open up their engines their was can lift a cabin cruiser out of the water . Great fun when your in a boat but not on a smaller craft !
 
OP
OP
Dayvo

Dayvo

just passin' through
I'll cut and paste the main content.


In an inspired burst of think-outside-the-street strategy, a London consortium is floating an audacious plan to turn part of the River Thames into a nearly eight-mile-long, bikes-only pathway.


p028gsmf.jpg

An artist's rendering of London's Thames Deckway. (Leon Cole/River Cycleway Consortium/Rex)

Aimed at reducing the ever-present risk of bike-meets-lorry encounters on the city’s traffic-choked streets, the so-called Thames Deckway would hug the south bank of the river between Battersea and Canary Wharf, with the midpoint at Millennium Bridge. The sleek, futuristic-looking bikeway – think Blade Runner meets Waterworld – was trial-ballooned by the River Cycleway Consortium Ltd. The group’s leaders are Britisharchitect David Nixon and entrepreneur/artist Anna Hill, working in conjunction with design/engineering firm Arup (of Sydney Opera House fame) and Hugh Broughton Architects.

The team has yet to reveal design details about just how the bikeway would float and what materials would be used, but the project, which reportedly will be privately financed, is expected to cost an estimated £600 million (about $965 million). Proponents say a flat-rate toll of £1.50 (around $2.40) per biker per journey will help fund maintenance expenses.

The Deckway would feature access ramps and refreshment kiosks, as well as on-board sensors that, via satellite, would relay data to bikers about things such as traffic density and flow, as well as river and weather conditions. The bikeway would rise and fall with the Thames’ tides, and solar, tidal and wind energy would supply power for lighting and other needs.

If approved, the bikeway – which would accommodate 12,000 bikers per hour and clip the time it takes to cross the city by 30 minutes – could be completed in as little as two years.

The proposal is the latest in a series of ambitious plans designed to make London – where population is expected to grow by 12 percent in the next decade – safer and easier to navigate by bike. Late last year, for example, British architect and ardent cycling proponent Sir Norman Foster (the founder of world-recognized Foster + Partners and the designer of the Gherkin tower), along with landscape architects Exterior Architecture Ltd. and urban planners Space Syntax Ltd., unveiled a proposal for SkyCycle, an elevated bike path.

This 220-km-long (136-mile), three-story-high network of car-free bike paths, punctuated by 200 access points, would follow existing urban rail lines. While a total cost wasn’t announced, a short four-mile-long first leg reportedly carries a price tag of £220 million (about $353 million). But supporters say that’s cheaper than building more roads.

In addition, avid cyclist and London Mayor Boris Johnson, who’s pushing for a “cycling revolution” in London, is championing development of the “Crossrail for bike” project: 21 miles of bike paths that would be almost completely segregated from motor traffic.

Safe biking is no idle matter in London, where bikers represent nearly 25 percent of rush-hour traffic in the central city. During a tragic, 13-day stretch in 2013, six bikers died on city roads. And between 2006 and 2011, the number of cycling casualties reportedly rose by 50 percent. Moreover, bicyclers in London account for a disproportionately high share of deaths and serious injuries in relation to their relatively small numbers, compared to motorists.

The biggest obstacle to Londoners eventually enjoying a leisurely bike ride on the Thames is, of course, funding. Even though proponents of such projects point to numerous benefits, such as less pollution, a healthier populace, reduced traffic congestion, fewer biking injuries and decreased fossil-fuel consumption, the road to urban-biking Nirvana is littered with visionary projects that never got rolling.

Consider, for example, Toronto architect Chris Hardwicke’s Velo-City, in which cyclists would pedal through elevated glass tubes, or the $25 million Veloway, a stalled proposal for an elevated bikeway in Melbourne, Australia, that would run alongside an urban rail line.

Others ideas have succeeded, though, like the Hovenring, an elevated bike roundabout that hovers like a low-tech flying saucer in Eindhoven in The Netherlands. Or the on-going development of 11 miles of bike-only “superhighways” in bicycle-happy Copenhagen, the unofficial biking capital of Europe, where 50 percent of residents commute by bike and bicycles outnumber residents.

Could the Deckway help London realize Johnson’s ambitions and wrest away the title of bike capital of Europe? Only time will tell if the idea sinks or swims.
 
I do. The practicality and feasibility of the scheme is amply illustrated by the fact they got primary school kids with fuzzy felt to do the mock up.
 

ianrauk

Tattooed Beat Messiah
Location
Rides Ti2
And what about HMS Belfast? That would have to be moved.
 
Top Bottom