vernon
Harder than Ronnie Pickering
- Location
- Meanwood, Leeds
Did not Nigella Lawson's now ex-husband end up in front of police even though she did not report the "assault" caught on camera?
Cake crime vs hate crime?
Did not Nigella Lawson's now ex-husband end up in front of police even though she did not report the "assault" caught on camera?
We all understand what ASL's are for! But the cyclist was determined not to let the driver go first right from the first part of the video.It's called an Advanced Stop Line, designed so that cyclists can get to the front of the traffic at lights. If you don't like them then lobby for their abolition. If you don't understand how they work maybe you should avoid them, but don't critcise someone who does.
As for 'deliberately holding up cars'? Do you understand the concept of Primary Position?
We get that assaulting someone is illegal. But the cyclist is an arse! Not an excuse, but it happens.Really? If you found yourself in a similar situation you would have got out of your car and hit the cyclist? You do know that assaulting someone is illegal in this country don't you? Whether or not you think they are a twat.
You'd better hope that the cyclist you jump out of your car to hit isn't me.
That's the point I am making....just cycle and enjoy! Life is too short for petty squabbles.If you don't go round ranting and raving at car drivers no one will get out and deck you. simple.
The cyclist is only shouting at the driver to satisfy his own ego.If people are shouting at you when you're driving you're probably a rubbish driver, as the clip proves.
It's a question of applying common sense. Why hold up a single car in almost no traffic? Answer....because I can!That is what he is telling the driver in the 2nd incident. I think having a car driven over your foot would be somewhat annoying!
In essence we have a car being driven aggressively causing possible injury to a cyclist. When the cyclist complains, albeit rather loudly, the cyclist is punched to the ground by an occupant of the car.
In my understanding ASLs are for the use of cyclists. To increase their safety. Clearly the Audi driver took exception to the cyclist using it in the way it is intended and lost his/her rag. I'd suggest that a driver who has that degree of control over a dangerous machine* is unfit to hold a licence and the passenger has clearly assaulted the cyclist who was complaining about having his foot run over.
* Audis do appear to be particularly dangerous machines!
That's the point I am making....just cycle and enjoy! Life is too short for petty squabbles.
I have had two run in's in the last two weeks and both I have dealt with a smile and "bloody hell mate you were close" then they give some glib excuse "you should really give cyclists more room in the future" they don't know what to do when you do it with a smile it blunts their aggression.That's what I say! And it takes 2 to tango as we all know. End of.
Agreed.the police aren't going to 'police' ASLs any more then they 'police' drivers speeding up when the light changes from green to amber.
And i also hope they wont bother policing petty squabbles that are essentially six of one and half a dozen of the other.Agreed.
I have had two run in's in the last two weeks and both I have dealt with a smile and "bloody hell mate you were close" then they give some glib excuse "you should really give cyclists more room in the future" they don't know what to do when you do it with a smile it blunts their aggression.
Last time I did that and they refused to pull over I made the mistake of cycling in front... To be hit from behind passed with them doing the self-gratification artist sign out the window and me braking a blood vessel for 3 miles in the hope traffic had slowed them up. Really trying to cap off my red mist too, cyclist was a stupid in this video but I know how it happens, he was more stupid for not being prepared for someone to get out..This is what I try and do - forgot on Tuesday and the red mist descended a little over an incident![]()