jonny jeez
Legendary Member
- Location
- Chislehurst, Kent, UK
That certainly fits with the nordic influence that I have met during my time there. I've spent months (overall) working out there and find the folk, the politics, The attitude and the landscape quite inspiring and very refreshing. They don't even have any military...don't need it. All of that will change as the country becomes more populated, most of the frankness and openness is down to the simple fact that everyone knows ...or is related to...one another, so there is little point in using any bullsh1t.Drifting off topic...I read (probably on Teh Intarwebs, so it must be true, that when the Vikings (or whomever) discovered Iceland, they thought it was quite a nice place to live, but didn't want everyone coming there. A bright spark decided, therefore, to call it Iceland, as "the clue is in the name". Greenland was named such for the opposite reason - it's barren, cold and unwelcoming, so we'll persuade people we don't want here to go there.
Having said all that, there is a lot wrong with Iceland, aside from its financial restrictions. There is a lack of culture and art, beyond local or folk. There is no real sense of identity, are they Vikings or Icelanders? And many of those who chose to move there, seem to also be escaping something, rather than adding something.(from my own personal experience)