classic33
Leg End Member
"The Atlas D missile was the natural choice for Project Mercury since it was the only launch vehicle in the US arsenal that could put the spacecraft into orbit. But its reliability was far from perfect and Atlas launches ending in explosions were an all-too common sight at Cape Canaveral. Thus, significant steps had to be taken to man-rate the missile and make it safe and reliable."There's every reason why not. ICBMs go high enough to enter space, but not fast enough to achieve orbit, let alone escape velocity. The Russian R7 frinstance, was designed to launch a 3 tonne nuke at the US. It just about got the 80kg Sputnik 1 into a low Earth orbit. Why would any country develop a missile capable of nuking the Moon, or Mars, or targeting meteorites? It was always The Other Side that was the target.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_LV-3B
NASA chose the U.S. Army's Redstone liquid-fueled ballistic missile for its suborbital flights as it was the oldest one in the US fleet, having been active since 1953 and had[1] many successful test flights.[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury-Redstone_Launch_Vehicle