I think the police are often unfairly accused of 'lack of action' when a 'cut and dried' case doesn't get to court. As an ex-plod I know that PCs can put a shedload of work into gathering evidence, statements etc to build up a case file, only for it to be rejected when it gets considered by the CPS - very frustrating for the police! I think the CPS must have a quota of cases that they are allowed to pursue due to considerations of budgets and court time, whatever, and cases like a lot of motoring offences which are perhaps seen as not such a high priority, don't make the cut. The problem is that I don't think these things are properly communicated to the victims of the offence who are left feeling short changed. In the case where a person uses a vehicle to hit a cyclist such as with cubist, my view is that it should not be treated as a motoring offence (careless driving for that is b*ll*cks) but the offender should be charged with attempted ABH/GBH which should ensure that it receives a higher rating at the CPS when deciding which cases to proceed to prosecute.