upsidedown said:
Sorry that doesn't add up.
If you ran somebody over because a cyclist's light blinded you you would be either:
a Driving too fast
b Not paying attention to what was going on around you and driving accordingly
c An incompetent driver
So lets get this straight.
You deliberately blind oncoming drivers and then claim
1) They are going too fast (1mph is too fast when an idiot takes your vision with a high powered torch but you still have to stop the vehicle)
2) They are not paying attention (i assume as a result of being blinded by an idiot with a high powered torch)
3) Robbed of their competence (when their vision was taken by an idiot with a high powered torch)
If I were driving along and you were to shine your torch into my eyes, and as a result of you using the torch as a weapon I ran someone over, how would this be my fault ?
People have been sent down for shining lasers into the eyes of Helicopter and Airline pilots before now, and I can't see how you can differentiate between these actions.
It is frankly a stupid strategy designed to injure other road users and you also quite frankly run the risk of a blinded driver running you over as a result of your actions.
I've got HID's on one of my cars which have the equivalent of 300 halogen watts combined, and as a result I have the ability to do this big time if I were so stupid - but I'm not.