But when people actually apportion blame upon the cyclist for not doing such things to potentially prevent the incident occuring - I have a real problem with that. It is still entirely the fault of the motorist who performed the dangerous/illegal maneuver - the nasty close pass, pulling out etc - because they did it.
I agree, but there is a dangerous tendency on the part of cyclists, when assessing a collision, to avoid recognizing cyclist errors that can contribute to an accident and instead to look only at the motorist's fault. This may lead to an unwillingness to look towards improving one's own cycling.
Here's an example:
http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/2011/11/30/classic-left-cross/
Is that wholly the motorist's fault? Wholly the cyclist's fault? The motorist is technically/legally at fault, because he entered a lane of traffic (the bike lane) without checking to make sure it was clear. But both could have done certain things to avoid the problem, as the discussion on the webpage shows. Interestingly, after I commented on his original video, the person who uploaded it (the cyclist's boyfriend/husband) barred comments on it, presumably because he wasn't willing to hear criticism of the cyclist's behaviour. So I can only assume Ana (if her experience didn't sour her on cycing altogether) is still filtering past queues of slow/stopped vehicles at high speed and thereby risking similar incidents.
There's a big difference between errors that contribute to an accident and the fault of the person who was the primary cause of the accident. No accident is black and white, with one person carrying all the blame while the other is entirely blameless. I'd say that, except for cases that involve excessive speed or poor weather conditions, in 99% of accidents that happen on the road, it takes two to tango: one is leading the dance, for sure, but the other person is not exactly sitting it out.