do hi viz vests/jackets work ?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

BentMikey

Rider of Seolferwulf
Location
South London
Tell that to all the parents and kids cycling in the Netherlands, oh and before you say it, cycling in the Netherlands is only a little safer than cycling in the UK, both are very safe overall.
 

wafflycat

New Member
Having cycled in various European countries, one of the things that stuck me as the difference between 'over here' and 'over there' is the attitude to cycling by those who are cycling and those who are not. Very different to here. 'Over there' cycling is something that is seen as *normal* You don't have to wear special clothing, a special hat, special colours. It's all just part of everyday living, a way to get from A to B (without being seen as a loony fringe), a way to have fun, to spend a Sunday, to get to work, to do the shopping, for kids to play... all without special clothes, or a special hat. And somehow I don't think that 'Over there' they love their kids any less than we do 'over here'. Yet there is a distinct difference in attitude.
 

botchjob

Veteran
BentMikey said:
Tell that to all the parents and kids cycling in the Netherlands, oh and before you say it, cycling in the Netherlands is only a little safer than cycling in the UK, both are very safe overall.

As i said, each to their own. Do you have kids who ride bikes on the road or who you take out on childseats ?

I have cycled in Holland and I can tell you it's a thousand times safer than riding in Hackney.
 

BentMikey

Rider of Seolferwulf
Location
South London
botchjob said:
As i said, each to their own. Do you have kids who ride bikes on the road or who you take out on childseats ?

I have cycled in Holland and I can tell you it's a thousand times safer than riding in Hackney.

Yes on the road. Can you back that up with stats? No, didn't think so.

Magic Foam Hats (TM).
 

BentMikey

Rider of Seolferwulf
Location
South London
p.s. if it really was a thousand times more dangerous to cycle in Hackney, don't you think you'd be an extremely irresponsible parent to have your kids on bikes at all?

The reality is that the benefits of cycling far outweigh the risks, and it's not particularly dangerous at all in the UK. So I don't really think you're irresponsible, but I do think you should place less value in the safety of magic foam hats, and more in teaching your kids good cycling and roadcraft.
 

silverbow

New Member
Location
Suffolk
botchjob said:
I love the hi-viz and/or helmet debate. Each to their own. In my younger days, with the wind in my hair and sun on my back, I used neither, and am still around to tell the tale. But now that I’m a little older, perhaps wiser, with a Mrs Botchjob and kids in tow, I err on the side of caution. However marginal and debatable the benefits, I would feel a right twunt if I cycled into the afterlife simply because of something I could have done but didn’t.

Whenever I contemplate whether I should wear my helmet this article always pops into mind:

http://www.bikereader.com/contributors/Ballantine/helmets.html
 

Origamist

Legendary Member
botchjob said:
As i said, each to their own. Do you have kids who ride bikes on the road or who you take out on childseats ?

I have cycled in Holland and I can tell you it's a thousand times safer than riding in Hackney.

Not quite a 1000 times safer...

Cylists killed per 100 million km cycled
Netherlands: 1.1
UK: 3.6​


Cylists injured per 10 million km cycled
Netherlands: 1.4
UK: 6.0

Sources:
Department for Transportation (2007)
Netherlands Ministry of Transport (2007
 

silverbow

New Member
Location
Suffolk
Origamist said:
Not quite a 1000 times safer...

Cylists killed per 100 million km cycled
Netherlands: 1.1
UK: 3.6​


Cylists injured per 10 million km cycled
Netherlands: 1.4
UK: 6.0

Sources:
Department for Transportation (2007)
Netherlands Ministry of Transport (2007

Wow, I would have never thought that over 3.5 x's cyclisted killed in the Netherlands over the UK, that's quite significant.

But we must remember that there are Lies, Dam Lies and Statistics. These statistics tell us how many cyclists died over number of Km cycled. What they don't say is where those miles where cycled, how the cyclists died and how many vehicle overtakes per km each cyclist endures, I could go on but I think you get the picture. Nevertheless there does appear to be quite a difference.
 

silverbow

New Member
Location
Suffolk
Origamist said:
Not quite a 1000 times safer...

Cylists killed per 100 million km cycled
Netherlands: 1.1
UK: 3.6​


Cylists injured per 10 million km cycled
Netherlands: 1.4
UK: 6.0

Sources:
Department for Transportation (2007)
Netherlands Ministry of Transport (2007


Using these figures, what is interesting is that in the Netherlands over 100 million km 14 where seriously injured and 1.1 killed, where as the UK 60 injured and 3.6 killed. So your chances on being in a series accident are greater in the UK. However, once in a serious accident your chances of dying are greatier in the Netherlands (7.8%) over the UK (6%)!

Also, what does serious accident mean?
 

Origamist

Legendary Member
Welcome, Silverbow to the "wonderful" world of pan-European accident stats...

There are always problems comparing injury statistics across different countries because of differences in definitions and methodologies of data collection. The headline figures only present the tip of the statistical iceberg...
 

silverbow

New Member
Location
Suffolk
Statistics are something I enjoy(?) pulling apart, it was one of my favorite things on my MBA. I always chuckle when I read a taboild twisting findings or pulling a subset of data to prove a point.

However, I must say I'm sure that cyclists in the Netherlands are more protected than they are here - although that is just a hunch. Thanks for posting them though, I think they illustrate the point well.

When I've been to Copenhagen I've always been impressed by the facilities and consideration given to cyclists, I really wish it was like that here.

Nevertheless, I say wear that hi-viz jacket and stay alert.
 

Origamist

Legendary Member
silverbow said:
Statistics are something I enjoy(?) pulling apart, it was one of my favorite things on my MBA. I always chuckle when I read a taboild twisting findings or pulling a subset of data to prove a point.

However, I must say I'm sure that cyclists in the Netherlands are more protected than they are here - although that is just a hunch. Thanks for posting them though, I think they illustrate the point well.

When I've been to Copenhagen I've always been impressed by the facilities and consideration given to cyclists, I really wish it was like that here.

Nevertheless, I say wear that hi-viz jacket and stay alert.

The Dutch have "strict liability" enshrined in law, but more importantly, more Dutch drivers cycle, so they tend to treat cyclists better...

I always enjoy cycling in Copenhagen and Malmo...
 

BentMikey

Rider of Seolferwulf
Location
South London
I think by far the biggest factor is the sheer number of Dutch cyclists. That's also what's likely to make London a much safer place to ride than most of the UK.
 
Top Bottom